Juvenile (under 18)
Knowing what to do starts with knowing what works, and what hasn't. CrimeSolutions helps practitioners and policymakers understand what programs & practices work, are promising, or haven't worked yet.
On this page you can find programs and practices related to Juvenile (under 18). Select "Search Filters" to narrow down the list by rating, extent of evidence, and many other aspects of the programs or practices. Skip to Practices
CrimeSolutions’ ratings are assigned from standardized reviews of rigorous evaluations and meta-analyses. While we encourage you to learn more about this process, you don’t need to in order to benefit from it. Our clear ratings and profiles can help you determine if a program or category of program is worth pursuing.
Icon | Rating | Program Rating Description | Practice Rating Description |
---|---|---|---|
Effective | Implementing the program is likely to result in the intended outcome(s). | On average, there is strong evidence that implementing a program encompassed by the practice will achieve the intended outcome. | |
Promising | Implementing the program may result in the intended outcome(s) | On average, there is some evidence that implementing a program encompassed by the practice will achieve the intended outcome. | |
No Effects | Implementing the program is unlikely to result in the intended outcome(s) and may result in a negative outcome(s). | On average, there is strong evidence that implementing a program encompassed by the practice will not achieve the intended outcome or may result in a negative outcome. |
Programs
Showing Results For:
Topic: juvenile (under 18)Title | Evidence Rating | Topics | Summary | RCT | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Program Profile: eHealth Familias Unidas |
|
Schools, Mental health, Suicide, Underage drinking, Treatment, School climate, Internet, Computers, Substance abuse, Alcohol, Legal substances, Drugs, Juvenile (under 18), No Effects Evidence Rating | The goals of the online mental health program for Hispanic families are to prevent and reduce depressive and anxious symptoms, suicide ideation/behaviors, and drug use in Hispanic youth. The program is rated No Effects. The program did not have a statistically significant impact on past-90-day alcohol use and family functioning. The treatment group had a statistically significant reduction in past-90-day drug use, prescription drug use, and cigarette use, compared with the control group. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Plus Mindfulness Meditation for Adolescent Alcohol Consumption (Australia) |
|
Schools, Alcohol, Underage drinking, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Substance abuse, Legal substances, Drugs, Promising Evidence Rating | This program uses psycho–social and present-moment awareness techniques to target adolescents’ alcohol-related cognitions and prevent their alcohol use. The program is rated Promising. Adolescents who received the intervention had reduced growth of alcohol consumption, compared with adolescents in the control group. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in both negative and positive alcohol expectancies and drinking refusal self-efficacy. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: PSYCHOPATHY.COMP (Portugal) |
|
Mental health | This is an individual compassion-focused, therapy-based intervention adapted from traditional compassionate-focused therapy to reduce psychopathic traits in youth in a correctional setting in Portugal. The program is rated Promising. The program was shown to statistically significantly decrease measures of psychopathic traits, grandiose manipulative, callous–unemotional, impulsive irresponsible, daring irresponsible, and conduct disorder traits. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Young Adult Family Check-Up (YA-FCU) |
|
Schools, Juvenile health, Mental health, Youth development, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Drugs, Substance abuse | The program focuses on the relationship between young adults and their parents to prevent substance misuse and other high-risk behaviors and enhance protective factors such as improving communication and strengthening familial relationships, encouraging healthy peer and romantic relationships, and promoting self-efficacy. The program is rated No Effects. It made no statistically significant impact on reducing the risk level for a problematic transition into young adulthood. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Bringing in the Bystander High School Curriculum |
|
Stalking, Violent crime, Assault, Dating violence, School climate, Rape and sexual assault, Crime prevention, Juvenile (under 18), Intimate partner violence, Victims of crime | The goal of this bystander-focused, classroom-delivered curriculum is to reduce rates of interpersonal violence among high school students. The program is rated No Effects. The program had no statistically significant impact on various measures of interpersonal violence, victim empathy, and measures of proactive bystander behavior. There was a statistically significant decrease for the treatment group in bystander denial about the role students could play in preventing interpersonal violence. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Impact of the Wraparound Program for Dually Involved Youth (Florida) on Youth Arrests |
|
Children exposed to violence, Trauma, Case Management, Family reunification, Foster care/child welfare system, Comprehensive/wraparound services, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | The program is an intensive case management model for providing services to youths simultaneously involved in the child welfare and juvenile justice systems, with the goal of reducing recidivism. The program is rated No Effects. There was no statistically significant difference in youth arrests between youths who participated in the Wraparound Program, compared with youths in the treatment-as-usual condition. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Restorative Justice Conferencing in Rhode Island Schools |
|
Youth development, School climate, Schools, Victims of crime, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This is a school program to address student misbehavior and repair harm. The program is rated No Effects. Middle schoolers in the treatment group had a statistically significant higher likelihood of disciplinary referrals and out-of-school suspensions, compared with comparison group students, which was the opposite of what was intended. There were no statistically significant differences in disciplinary referrals or suspensions between high schoolers in the treatment and the comparison groups. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Spotlight Serious Offender Services Unit (Canada) |
|
Youth gangs, Probation, Violent offenders, Comprehensive/wraparound services, Juvenile detention, Juvenile justice, Juvenile (under 18), Gang Crime, Crime prevention, Child health and welfare, Juvenile delinquency | This was an urban-based intensive supervision program in which high-risk, gang-affiliated youths (ages 12–19) were assigned to work with a probation officer who was paired with a paid “street mentor.” The program is rated Promising. Youths in the program were significantly less likely than those in the comparison group to have a new conviction in the follow-up period of up to 3 years and remained offense-free for a longer period. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: School-Based Law Enforcement Framework (Texas) |
|
School safety, Training, School climate, Schools, Juvenile delinquency, Crime prevention, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Victimization, Victims of crime, School climate | This is a framework of recommended practices for integrating police into the educational environment to enhance a safe school climate. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences in treatment and control school students’ delinquency, victimization, exclusionary discipline, relationships with adults, perceptions of police, nor school bonding, connectedness, and safety. Treatment school students had statistically significant increases in rule clarity. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Social Problem-Solving Training (SPST) in a Juvenile Detention Setting |
|
Mental health, Positive youth development, Treatment, Young juvenile offenders, Probation, Corrections, Community corrections, Juvenile justice, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Juvenile detention, Juvenile detention | This intervention was designed to help adolescent males in detention with interpersonal stress and conflict. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant effects on depressive symptoms, recidivism, social problem-solving, anger response, anger control, and inward expression of anger. However, the treatment as usual control condition was found to have a statistically significant reduction on outward expression of anger, a result in the other-than-expected direction. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Risk Reduction through Family Therapy (RRFT) for Adolescents |
|
Mental health, Substance abuse, Children exposed to violence, Trauma, Treatment, Rape and sexual assault, Violent crime, Crisis response, Juvenile (under 18), Drugs, Drug treatment | The goal of this exposure-based, integrative intervention was to reduce substance use and mental health problems in adolescents who have experienced trauma. The program is rated Promising. The program had a statistically significant impact on depressive and internalizing symptoms, family cohesion, and family conflict. There were mixed results for PTSD symptoms and substance use. There was no statistically significant impact on externalizing symptoms. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Coaching Boys Into Men (Middle School) |
|
Mental health, Youth development, Recreation, Schools, Rape and sexual assault, Violent crime, Crime prevention, Juvenile (under 18), Mentoring, Child health and welfare, Juvenile delinquency | This program aims to prevent sexual violence in middle school male athletes. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences between treatment and control group athletes in reports of abuse (relationship, cybersexual, or sexual), sexual harassment, negative bystander behaviors, sex-equitable attitudes, or intention to intervene. Treatment group athletes reported statistically significantly more positive bystander behaviors and recognized more signs of abuse. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Reentry Services of Clay County (Minnesota) |
|
Probation, Mental health, Substance abuse, Reentry, Case Management, Treatment, Comprehensive/wraparound services, Access to education, Corrections, Juvenile detention, Juvenile justice, Juvenile (under 18), Mentoring, Child health and welfare, Juvenile delinquency | This is a one-to-one mentoring program aimed at improving public safety by assisting youths who commit offenses with comprehensive reentry services following their release into the community. The program is rated No Effects. There was no statistically significant difference between program and comparison group youths in prevalence of reoffense. Program youths had statistically significantly fewer official juvenile justice contacts within 1 year of release, compared with comparison group youth Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Mindfulness in Schools Project’s “.b” Curriculum |
|
Mental health, Youth development, Schools, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18) | This is a school-based program that works to improve emotional awareness and regulation in adolescents to improve their mental health outcomes. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences between students who received the intervention and students in the control group who did not receive the intervention in measures of resilience, anxiety, depression, socioemotional functioning, well-being, drug use, self-harm, suicidal ideation, and mindfulness. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Oklahoma's Juvenile Second Chance Act Reentry Program (Tulsa, OK) |
|
Reentry, Case Management, Corrections, Juvenile recidivism prediction, Crime prevention, Juvenile delinquency, Juvenile justice, Juvenile detention | This is a juvenile reentry program that offers services to youth returning to the community in Tulsa, Okla., after their out-of-home placements. The goal of the program is to reduce rates of recidivism for high-risk youth. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences in reconviction rates for treatment group youth who received the program’s services, compared with comparison group youth who did not receive services. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Detention Diversion Advocacy Program (DDAP) |
|
Juvenile courts, Diversion, Violent offenders, Corrections, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Case processing, Juvenile detention | This is a program that aims to divert youths charged with serious offenses from detention, with an overall goal of reducing recidivism. The program is rated Promising. Comparison group participants were more likely than treatment group participants to recidivate and to recidivate for a felony charge. Comparison group participants had a higher average number than treatment group participants of referrals and felony referrals. All differences were statistically significant. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Early Intervention Diversion Program (EIDP) (Los Angeles, Calif.) |
|
Juvenile courts, Diversion, Treatment, Young juvenile offenders, Corrections, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Juvenile justice | The program is an alternative to formal processing in the juvenile justice system. The overall goal is to reduce the number of youths entering the juvenile justice system, while also reducing recidivism. The program is rated Promising. Youths in the treatment group who participated in the diversion program had statistically significantly fewer rearrests, compared with youths in the comparison group who did not participate in the intervention. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Resilience, Opportunity, Safety, Education, Strength (ROSES) |
|
Girls, Juvenile courts, Diversion, Truancy, Trauma, Case Management, Treatment, Diversion, Juvenile justice, Child health and welfare | This is a community-based, trauma-informed, gender-responsive advocacy intervention for girls 11 to 17 years old who are at risk for or already involved in the juvenile justice system. The program is rated Promising. Intervention group girls were less likely to engage in physical fights and minor status offending behavior (i.e., missing fewer days of school), compared with control group girls. These differences were statistically significant. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Pennsylvania Horticultural Society’s Vacant Lot Greening Program |
|
Burglary, Larceny/theft, Gun violence, Robbery, Environmental design, Crime prevention, Property crime, Juvenile delinquency, Juvenile (under 18), Assault, Gun violence, Violent crime, Public order offenses, Crime prevention | This was an intervention to reduce crime and delinquency in urban areas by remediating vacant land. The program is rated Promising. Compared with the control area, treatment areas experienced statistically significant reductions in gun assaults, burglary, nuisances, shootings (overall and per kilometer), and all crimes overall. However, the intervention showed mixed results with regard to drug offense rates and no statistically significant effect on robbery/theft rates. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: IMpower Program for American Indian Girls |
|
Tribal youth, Dating violence, School climate, Crime prevention, Rape and sexual assault, Violent crime, Victimization, Tribal, Juvenile (under 18), Crime prevention, Rape and sexual assault, Intimate partner violence, Victims of crime | This was a sexual assault prevention program adapted for American Indian girls that sought to reduce sexual assault victimization and to improve sexual assault resistance skills and self-defense knowledge. The program is rated Promising. Girls who received the intervention reported statistically significantly lower rates of sexual assault and sexual harassment, compared with girls in the comparison group. However, there was no impact on reported rates of physical dating violence. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: iMentor’s College Ready Program |
|
Mental health, Youth development, Jobs and workforce development, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Juvenile delinquency prevention, Juvenile delinquency | This mentoring program for urban high school students is designed to improve college readiness. The program is rated No Effects. Compared with comparison students, treatment students were more likely to graduate and reported higher self-advocacy and critical thinking. These differences were statistically significant. There were no statistically significant differences in attending college, taking AP courses, task persistence, sitting in on college courses, seeking help, or growth mindset. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Chance UK |
|
Youth development, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Juvenile delinquency | This is a one-to-one mentoring program in which children (ages 5–11) meet weekly over 12 months with an adult volunteer. Mentors engage in structured activities to help reduce behavior and emotional problems in children by developing self-esteem, self-efficacy, social skills, and future aspirations. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in parent- and teacher-rated problem or prosocial behavior or in child self-esteem or goals. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Routine Inquiry About Violence Victimization and Follow-Up Support (Sweden) |
|
Girls, Treatment, Victims of crime, Violent crime, Intimate partner violence, Rape and sexual assault | This is a program for young women in nonemergency health centers in Sweden. It involves routine inquiry about their experiences with violence victimization and offers empowerment strategies for victimized women. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences between the intervention and control groups in self-reported measures of physical violence, sexual violence (touch or penetration), and emotional violence at the 12-month follow-up. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Safe and Successful Youth Initiative (SSYI) (Massachusetts) |
|
Gang Crime, Assault, Gun violence, Homicide, Violent offenders, Jobs and workforce development, Crime prevention, Victimization, Victims of crime, Juvenile (under 18), Young adults (18-24), Gangs | This secondary violence prevention program targets young men most likely to commit or be victim of gang or gun crime to reduce their incarceration and victimization from violent crime. The program is rated Promising. SSYI youths were statistically significantly less likely to be incarcerated compared with comparison group youths. SSYI–funded cities had statistically significant reductions in all measured city-level crime victimization rates, compared with comparison cities. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Nurturing Families Network (NFN) Home-Visiting Program |
|
Children exposed to violence, Foster care/child welfare system, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Crime prevention | This is a home-visiting program for first-time mothers in high-risk families that promotes positive parenting to prevent child maltreatment and out-of-home placements. The program is rated No Effects. Treatment group families had a statistically significant lower number of substantiated child maltreatment and neglect cases, compared with the comparison group, but there was no statistically significant effect on out-of-home placements, and substantiated physical abuse. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: GEAR UP – Academic Mentoring in Mathematics |
|
Youth development, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Juvenile delinquency prevention, Juvenile delinquency | This is a school-based mentoring program for low-income high school students designed to increase academic achievement and college attendance and success. The program is rated Promising. Program participants had a statistically significant increase in receiving a C grade or above in algebra I and in scores on a standardized state math exam, compared with the comparison group. However, there was not a statistically significant difference between groups in receiving a C grade or above in geometry. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Eye to Eye |
|
Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Mental health, Juvenile delinquency | This is a group-mentoring afterschool program in which elementary and middle school students with the diagnosis of a learning disability (LD) or attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) meet with high school or college student mentors who also have LD/ADHD, to discuss and address their strengths and challenges. The program is rated Promising. The program was shown to be associated with statistically significant decreases in depression and increases in self-esteem over the program period. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: One Summer Plus–Jobs Only (Chicago, Ill.) |
|
Youth development, Jobs and workforce development, Property crime, Crime prevention, Mentoring, Child health and welfare, Juvenile delinquency, Employment initiatives, Violent crime | This is a summer jobs program in Chicago, Ill., which seeks to reduce youth violence by providing high-risk students (grades 8–12) with part-time summer employment and access to an adult job mentor. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences between the treatment group and the control group in violent crime arrests, property crime arrests, drug arrests, or other arrests. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Responsive Aggression Regulation Therapy (Netherlands) |
|
Mental health, Violent offenders, Treatment, Recidivism, Corrections, Crime prevention, Juvenile detention, Juvenile delinquency, Mentoring, Child health and welfare | This is a responsive intervention that seeks to reduce severe aggressive behaviors of incarcerated youth at a juvenile justice institution in the Netherlands. The program is rated Promising. Intervention group youth, compared with treatment-as-usual group youth, had statistically significant higher aggression-related skills, lower cognitive distortions (such as how youth think about aggression), and a lower recidivism risk for violent and general offenses at the 3-year follow up. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Cooperative Learning |
|
Schools, Underage drinking, School safety, Youth development, School climate, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Alcohol, Substance abuse, Drugs | This is a group-based learning approach that seeks to enhance peer relations by increasing opportunities for positive social integration between adolescents. The program is rated Promising. Students in intervention schools reported they were less willing to use alcohol, had fewer deviant peer affiliations, lower perceived student stress and emotional problems, and had higher academic engagement, compared with students in control schools. These differences were statistically significant. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Mentoring Program for Youth-Headed Households in Rwanda |
|
Mental health, Youth development, Child health and welfare, Juvenile delinquency | This is a mentoring program that uses volunteer community members to strengthen the supportive environment and improve psychosocial outcomes among youth living without an adult caregiver in rural Rwanda. The program is rated Promising. Youth in the intervention group showed statistically significant greater improvements in scores for depression, grief, marginalization, and adult support at 18 months, compared with the youth in the comparison group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Prev@cib Program (Spain) |
|
Bullying, School safety, Computers, Campus Crime, Children exposed to violence, School climate, Schools, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Victimization, Victims of crime | This is an anti-bullying program for adolescents in Spain, which is designed to decrease bullying and cyberbullying perpetration and victimization both in the classroom and virtual environments. The program is rated Promising. There was a statistically significant decrease in bullying and victimization and cyberbullying and cybervictimization for the treatment group, compared with the control group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Children’s Advocacy Center Model |
|
Mental health, Treatment, Case Management, Rape and sexual assault, Violent crime, Victims of crime, Juvenile (under 18) | This program is a multidisciplinary, victim-focused approach designed to improve forensic interviewing and the continuity of care for youth who are victims of sexual abuse and assault. The program is rated Effective. The program showed a statistically significant increase in the receipt of physical health examinations and counseling referrals for treatment group youth, compared with youth in the community comparison group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: TakeCARE |
|
Dating violence, Campus Crime, School climate, Crime prevention, Rape and sexual assault, Violent crime, Crime prevention, Juvenile (under 18) | This is an online video program that seeks to promote and increase high school and college students’ efficacy in performing helpful bystander behavior in instances of relationship or sexual violence, to reduce sexual violence among young adults and adolescents. The program is rated Promising. The treatment group showed statistically significant increases in observed and self-reported bystander behavior and in efficacy to intervene, compared with the control group. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Crossover Youth Practice Model |
|
Family courts, Juvenile courts, Diversion, Children exposed to violence, Foster care/child welfare system, Crime prevention, Recidivism | This is a model that uses a conceptual plan and organizational framework to strengthen collaborations between child welfare and juvenile justice system professionals and partners to prevent or reduce youths’ involvement in the juvenile justice system or related systems of care. The program is rated Promising. Treatment group youth showed a statistically significant reduction in recidivism rates, compared with youth in the comparison groups. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Citizen Schools Extended Learning Time Model |
|
Youth development, Afterschool, Schools, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Mentoring | This is an afterschool program that prepares middle school students for academic and social success. The program is rated No Effects. Participants showed statistically significant higher rates of attendance and a greater likelihood of being on track to graduate and passing 12th grade English/language arts (ELA) than nonparticipants. Groups did not differ in ELA or math test scores, 12th grade suspensions, passing ELA and math comprehensive tests, or on-time promotion to 12th grade. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Olweus Bullying Prevention Program |
|
Bullying, School safety, School climate, School violence, Juvenile (under 18), Schools, Child health and welfare, Victimization, Victims of crime | This is a schoolwide, multicomponent intervention to reduce and prevent aggression and bullying among students. The program is rated Promising. There was a statistically significant intervention effect on teachers’ ratings of students’ physical, verbal, and relational aggression and victimization. However, there was no statistically significant intervention effect on students’ self-reports of physical and relational aggression and victimization. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Project Arrive |
|
Youth development, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Juvenile delinquency | This is a school-based group mentoring program that seeks to improve academic performance and promote resilience against criminal involvement for ninth graders at risk of dropping out. The program is rated No Effects. While there were statistically significant increases in problem solving and prosocial peers for the intervention group, there were no statistically significant differences between intervention and comparison students in juvenile offenses, empathy, and perceptions of home support. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: SafeCare© |
|
Juvenile health, Mental health, Case Management, Family reunification, Foster care/child welfare system, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Child protection | This is a home-visitation program that aims to prevent and address factors associated with child abuse and neglect. The program is rated Promising. Parents in the SafeCare group demonstrated statistically significant decreases in depression symptoms and risk of child protective services recidivism, compared with parents in the control group. However, there were no statistically significant differences in the risk of child physical abuse among a sample of American Indian parents. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Family Therapy for Adolescent Behavior Problems |
|
Mental health, Substance abuse, Treatment, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Alcohol, Drugs, Legal substances | This program assessed the impact of a nonmanualized family-based treatment approach for adolescent behavior problems. The program is rated No Effects. Results indicated that the treatment group experienced statistically significant reductions in adolescent-reported externalizing and internalizing behaviors. However, there were no statistically significant differences between groups in caregiver-reported externalizing and internalizing behaviors or in adolescent-reported alcohol or drug use. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Real Talk Dating Abuse Intervention |
|
Dating violence, Intimate partner violence, Violent crime, Crime prevention, Juvenile (under 18) | This program is a dating abuse intervention for youth, ages 15-19, which uses motivational interviewing with the goal of changing self-reported dating abuse perpetration. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences found between the intervention and control groups in any self-reported dating abuse perpetration, including physical, sexual, psychological, and cyber abuse, at the 6-month follow up. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Emotional and Behavioral Health Crisis Response and Prevention (EBH-CRP) |
|
Bullying, Mental health, School safety, School climate, Juvenile (under 18), Crisis response, Victims of crime | The program aims to increase school/community competence in responding to and preventing student emotional and behavioral health crises. This program is rated Promising. Compared with control schools, intervention schools had statistically significantly lower rates of suspensions and office referrals and had conducted more threat assessments and crisis interventions. However, there were no significant effects on bullying, juvenile justice referrals, and emotional or behavioral health incidents. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Evaluative Conditioning for Adolescent at Risk for Violence (South Korea) |
|
Treatment, Juvenile (under 18) | This program used conditioning methods to change the way at-risk adolescents implicitly think about violence. The goal was to train participants to associate violence with negative, instead of positive, objects or ideas. The program is rated Promising. Adolescents who received evaluative conditioning demonstrated a statistically significant increase in negative implicit attitudes toward violence, compared with the control group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Targeted RECLAIM (Ohio) |
|
Diversion, Treatment, Comprehensive/wraparound services, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Civil courts, Juvenile detention, Juvenile justice | This is a diversion program intended to reduce juvenile recidivism by treating youths in the community in place of incarceration. This program is rated as Promising. Youths in the treatment group were statistically significantly less likely to be incarcerated during the 1-year follow-up, compared with youths in the control group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Functional Family Therapy-Child Welfare (FFT-CW®) |
|
Treatment, Case Management, Family reunification, Foster care/child welfare system, Child health and welfare, Intimate partner violence | This adapted version of Functional Family Therapy is designed to improve functioning for child welfare-involved families. This program is rated Promising. Treatment families showed a statistically significant greater likelihood of achieving all treatment goals and a lower likelihood of being referred to another program at case closing, compared with control families. However, there were no statistically significant differences between groups in out-of-home placements. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Family Finding |
|
Family courts, Children exposed to violence, Case Management, Family reunification, Foster care/child welfare system, Juvenile (under 18) | This program is designed to find and engage kin and fictive kin to support the needs of foster care youth. The program is rated Promising. There was a statistically significant greater number of kin and fictive kin found and positive attachment figures identified for the intervention group, compared with the comparison group. However, there was no significant difference in proportion of relative placements to total placements, reunification rates, or externalizing and internalizing behaviors. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Family Centered Treatment |
|
Home visiting, Treatment, Comprehensive/wraparound services, Juvenile detention | This is a short-term, family-based program, which is designed to reduce out-of-home placements for juvenile justice-involved youth. The program is rated Promising. Youth who received Family Centered Treatment were less likely to experience future conviction or incarceration in either the juvenile or adult justice systems, compared with youth who were placed in a group home. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: My Life Mentoring |
|
Dropout/expulsion, Foster care/child welfare system, Juvenile delinquency, Crime prevention, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Schools, Juvenile delinquency prevention | This individual and group mentoring intervention was designed to improve transition outcomes for foster youth by increasing their self-determination skills. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences between program participants and the comparison group in number of arrests or convictions, charge severity, range of punitive system involvement, comprehensive criminal justice involvement, delinquency, dropping out of high school, or homelessness. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Be BOLD Yoga for High-Risk Adolescents |
|
Schools, Marijuana, Alcohol, Mental health, Juvenile health, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Dropout/expulsion, Alternative schools, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Legal substances, Drugs | This is a mindfulness-based yoga program intended to reduce substance use (and the subsequent negative effects of use) for adolescents at high risk of dropping out of school. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences in measures of substance use, self-regulation, mood, mindfulness, or coping skills for youth who participated in the program, compared with the control group youth. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Arches Transformative Mentoring Program |
|
Diversion, Violent offenders, Probation, Corrections, Community corrections, Crime prevention, Juvenile delinquency, Child health and welfare | This is a group mentoring program that seeks to reduce recidivism of youth on probation in New York City, using an interactive journaling curriculum based on cognitive-behavioral principles. The program is rated No Effects. Program participants showed a statistically significant reduction in felony reconvictions, compared with comparison group youth at 24 months; however, there were no statistically significant differences on arrests, felony arrests, or reconvictions. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Youth Advocate Programs, Inc. (YAP) |
|
Diversion, Crime prevention, Juvenile justice | This is an intervention designed to prevent future criminal activity among system-involved youth through using short-term, high-intensity relationships with paid mentors, referred to as Advocates. The program is rated Promising. Program participants showed statistically significant improvement in educational engagement and reductions in serious dispositions, compared with a comparison group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Protecting Strong African American Families (ProSAAF) |
|
Substance abuse, Youth development, Home visiting, Positive youth development | The program is designed to improve family functioning and enhance youth development by targeting parents’ relationships and parenting skills. The program is rated Effective. For the intervention group, there were statistically significant increases in levels of parental monitoring and positive self-concept, as well as statistically significant decreases in conduct problems and substance use initiation. There were no significant effects for racial pride socialization. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Availability, Responsiveness and Continuity (ARC) |
|
Mental health, Treatment, Juvenile (under 18) | This program is designed to enhance system effectiveness and organization, to improve client outcomes for child welfare and mental health agencies. The program is rated Promising. There were statistically significant reductions in problem behaviors for youth who were served by agencies that received the intervention, compared with youth who were served by control agencies. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Early Pathways |
|
Mental health, Home visiting, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This is a home-based, parent-and-child therapy program for the treatment of disruptive behaviors (such as physical aggression and oppositional behaviors) in toddlers and preschoolers who are living in poverty. The program is rated Promising. Compared to the control group, there were statistically significant positive effects found for improving children’s prosocial and challenging behaviors, parent and child play, and the discipline and nurturing behavior of caregivers. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Juvenile Justice Anger Management (JJAM) Treatment for Girls |
|
Girls, Mental health, Positive youth development, Treatment, Young juvenile offenders, Juvenile detention | The program is a cognitive–behavioral, anger management treatment for adolescent girls in residential juvenile justice facilities, which is designed to reduce participants’ anger, physical aggression, and relational aggression. The program is rated Promising. Program participants showed statistically significant reductions in anger, physical aggression, and relational aggression scores, compared with the control group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Parenting Intervention to Prevent Early Conduct Problems and Improve Parenting Practices (New York City) |
|
Home visiting, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | The program is a family-based, group preventive intervention for preschool children who are at high risk for antisocial behavior. The program is rated Promising. The intervention had statistically significant effects on observed child physical aggression, responsive parenting, and stimulation for learning, but had no statistically significant effects on parent-rated child physical aggression or harsh parenting practices. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Great Life Mentoring |
|
Mental health, Youth development, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Juvenile delinquency | This is a one-on-one mentoring program in which youth referred from a community mental health agency receive support from adult volunteers with whom they spend 2 to 3 hours weekly on positive community activities. The program is rated Effective. The intervention was shown to be associated with a statistically significant increase in global functioning and a lower likelihood of an unplanned and client-initiated ending of treatment. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Power Source |
|
Mental health, Treatment, Corrections, Correctional facilities, Juvenile detention, Juvenile justice, Juvenile (under 18) | This is a group-based, cognitive-behavioral therapy and mindfulness training intervention targeted at male youth in high-security correctional facilities. The program is rated Promising. Results indicated a statistically significant reduction in the decline of attention skills for the treatment group, measured as accuracy and response variability on the Attention Network Test; however, there was no statistically significant effect on response time. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Playworks Coach |
|
Truancy, Youth development, Positive youth development, Recreation, School climate, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This is a program for low-income elementary schools that encourages healthy and meaningful play, delivered by trained coaches. Program components include recess activities, class game time, and after-school activities. This program is rated Promising. There was a small, statistically significant increase in attendance rates for students who participated in Playworks, compared with students who did not participate. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Operation Night Light (ONL) (Midwest) |
|
Gang Crime, Youth gangs, Probation, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Violent offenders, Home visiting, Case Management, Young juvenile offenders, Corrections, Community corrections, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Juvenile detention, Juvenile justice | This is a home-visiting program for youth on probation who are considered at high risk of recidivism. The program is rated No Effects. Compared with the treatment group, the control group was more likely to have completed probation, less likely to have probation revoked due to a technical violation, and committed fewer new crimes during probation; however, they recidivated sooner. There were no differences in the probation revocations due to severity of a new crime. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Enough! Preventing Child Sexual Abuse in My School |
|
School safety, Schools, Juvenile (under 18) | This is an interactive, one-hour, online training course that educates school personnel on identifying, reporting, and preventing child sexual abuse (CSA). This program is rated Promising. There was a statistically significant increase in knowledge about CSA for teachers who participated in the training, compared with teachers who did not participate. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Baloo and You (Germany) |
|
Youth development, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Juvenile delinquency | This is a mentoring program for disadvantaged elementary school children that aims to enrich their social environment and enable their acquisition of new skills through an authentic relationship with a caring adult. This program was rated Promising. The findings show a statistically significant improvement in the prosocial behavior and likelihood of high-track attendance in school for the children assigned to the intervention, compared with children in the control group. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Alcohol Literacy Challenge |
|
Alcohol-Related Offenses, Schools, Alcohol, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Juvenile (under 18), Young adults (18-24), Campus, Schools, Child health and welfare, Drugs | This program consists of a single-session, group-delivered intervention for high school and college students, which is designed to alter alcohol expectancies and lower alcohol use. The program is rated Promising. The program was shown to have a statistically significant effect on modifying alcohol expectancy processes and reducing alcohol consumption in college students; however, there was no statistically significant impact on high school students. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Change A Life |
|
Children exposed to violence, Intimate partner violence, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18) | A free, interactive online program for adults designed to educate the public about the effects of childhood exposure to domestic violence (DV) and improve adults’ self-efficacy in helping children exposed to DV. The program is rated Promising. There was a statistically significant increase in knowledge about DV exposure for both community and university samples, compared with the control groups. There was a statistically significant increase in self-efficacy for only the community sample. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Behavioral, Emotional, and Social Training: Competent Learners Achieving School Success (BEST in CLASS) |
|
Juvenile health, Mental health, School safety, Youth development, School climate, Schools, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | A classroom-based intervention, delivered by teachers, designed to prevent emotional and behavioral disorders in high-risk children. The program is rated Effective. Intervention group children showed statistically significant improvement in behaviors, social and behavioral competence, and student-teacher relationships, compared with control group children. Intervention group teachers showed statistically significant improvements in instructional practices, compared with control group teachers. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Modular Approach to Therapy for Children with Anxiety, Depression, Trauma, or Conduct Problems (MATCH-ADTC) |
|
Mental health, Treatment, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | The program is a coordinated, component-based approach that allows for real-time adaptation of treatment to address the complex needs of clinically-referred, comorbid youths, whose problems and treatment needs can shift during treatment. The program is rated Promising. In examining MATCH-ADTC to usual care, there were mixed results across three evaluations, but there were statistically significant reductions in internalizing and externalizing problems, functioning, and severity of problems. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Pathways to Education (Canada) |
|
Youth development, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18) | This is a multicomponent program that aims to improve academic outcomes for high school students from low socioeconomic backgrounds primarily through a relationship with a student-parent support worker. This program is rated Promising. Youth eligible for the program were more likely to have graduated from high school and enrolled in postsecondary education within 5 years after starting high school, compared with youth in the comparison group. This difference was statistically significant. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: New York City Summer Youth Employment Program (SYEP) |
|
Truancy, Jobs and workforce development, Juvenile (under 18), Young adults (18-24), Schools, Campus, Employment initiatives | A summer youth employment program that is designed to improve school attendance, academic achievement, and employment of low-income youth between the ages of 14 and 24. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences in school attendance or academic achievement between program participants and the control group. However, there were statistically significant differences in employment and earnings for program participants, compared with the control group. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Coaching for Communities (CfC) [United Kingdom] |
|
Youth development, Drug abuse prevention and education, Drugs, Juvenile delinquency, Child health and welfare, Employment initiatives, Substance abuse, Legal substances, Drugs, Alcohol | This is a mentoring program for youth who show low levels of antisocial behavior. This program was rated Promising. Youth in the program had statistically significant improvements in offending behavior, antisocial behavior, negative affect, association with antisocial peers, emotional well-being, and involvement in education or employment, compared with youth in the control group, but not in volume of offending behavior, use of alcohol or drugs, impulsivity, or aspirations for the future. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Master Mind |
|
Schools, Alcohol, Juvenile health, Mental health, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Legal substances, Drugs | This was a mindfulness education and substance abuse prevention program for fourth- and fifth-grade students, which was designed to build self-regulatory skills and reduce intentions to use alcohol or tobacco. This program was rated Promising. There were statistically significant increases in measures of executive functioning, social problems, and aggression. There were no statistically significant effects on attention problems and intentions to use substances. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Coping Power Program-Child Component for Pakistani School Children |
|
Youth development, Positive youth development, School safety, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This is a school-based prevention program that targets fifth- and sixth-grade boys’ early aggressive behaviors to avoid later antisocial behavior in adolescence and adulthood. The program is rated Promising. The program was found to have a statistically significant effect in reducing both aggression in the boys and their tendency to interpret others’ actions as hostile. The program also improved the boys’ ability to respond in appropriate, non-aggressive ways to a variety of scenarios. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Peraj Mentoring Program (Mexico) |
|
Dropout/expulsion, Youth development, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Campus, Juvenile delinquency | This is a mentoring program for fifth- and sixth-grade public school students who are at increased risk for underachievement and antisocial behaviors. The program’s goals are to strengthen a students’ self-esteem, social skills, motivation, and study skills using college student mentors. This program was rated as Promising. Students who participated in the program had a statistically significantly lower risk of dropping out of school, compared with students in the comparison group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Effect of Hot Spots Policing Strategies on Citizen-Officer Interactions (St. Louis, Missouri) |
|
Community policing, Problem-oriented policing, Policing strategies, Law enforcement operations, Law enforcement | This intervention used two hot spots policing strategies (problem solving and directed patrol) to improve citizens’ perceptions of police in St. Louis, Mo. The program is rated No Effects. Although residents in both treatment groups reported a statistically significant increase in cooperation with the police, the preponderance of evidence suggests that the intervention had no significant impact on citizens’ perceptions of procedural justice, police legitimacy, or police abuse. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: YouthBuild Offender Program |
|
Diversion, Reentry, Youth development, Jobs and workforce development, Positive youth development, Treatment, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Juvenile detention, Juvenile justice, Juvenile (under 18), Young adults (18-24), Employment initiatives | The program provides education, vocational training, and other youth-development services to low-income youths, ages 16–24, who have been convicted of a crime. The program is rated Promising. The program statistically significantly reduced recidivism and increased the likelihood of receiving a high school diploma, GED, trade license, or training certificate. However, there were no effects on enrollment in postsecondary courses, employment, or certain measures of youth development. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Common Sense Parenting (CSP) Plus |
|
Youth development, Positive youth development, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18) | A parent training program designed to develop healthy parenting practices to improve child emotional regulation skills and high school preparedness among low-income eighth graders and their families during high school transition. This program is rated no effects. The study found no statistically significant differences in parenting practices (positive parenting, inconsistent discipline, poor supervision, and rationales for parental decisions) between program participants and the control group. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: School-Based Guided Self-Change |
|
Schools, Juvenile health, Mental health, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Treatment, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Alcohol, Drugs, Legal substances | This brief, cognitive behavioral, motivational intervention was designed to address alcohol and other drug use as well as aggressive behaviors among English- and Spanish-speaking adolescents who were already involved in drugs and aggressive behavior. This program is rated No Effects. The study found no statistically significant differences in measures of substance use and aggressive behaviors between adolescents in the treatment group, compared with adolescents receiving standard care. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: GenerationPMTO (Parent Model Training Oregon) |
|
Youth development, Positive youth development, Juvenile delinquency, Crime prevention, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This is a parent-training program for parents who have gone through a recent marital separation and for their families. The program is rated Promising. The program was found to have a statistically significant effect on reducing measures of youths’ delinquency, arrests, and problem behaviors and improving measures of parenting skills. There was no effect, however, on parents’ use of appropriate discipline. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Free Talk |
|
Juvenile courts, Alcohol-Related Offenses, Marijuana, Alcohol, Diversion, Youth/peer courts, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Juvenile delinquency, Substance abuse, Legal substances | This is a group, motivational interviewing program for adolescents with a first-time alcohol or drug offense. The goal of the program is to prevent negative consequences of alcohol and other drug use. This program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences between the intervention and comparison groups on past month frequency of alcohol, heavy drinking, or marijuana use; alcohol or marijuana consequences; recidivism; delinquency; and alcohol and other drug use. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Check & Connect Plus Truancy Board (C&C+TB) |
|
Dropout/expulsion, Truancy, Child health and welfare | This is a school-based program that integrates a case-management framework for providing social support to truant youth. The goals of the program are to improve school attendance and renew progress toward graduation. This program is rated Promising. Students in the intervention group were more likely to have graduated and less likely to have dropped out than students in the comparison group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Enhancing Resiliency Amongst Students Experiencing Stress-Prosocial (ERASE-Stress–Prosocial) in Israel |
|
Mental health, Children exposed to violence, Trauma, Treatment, Schools, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This is a universal, school-based intervention for Jewish-Israeli students who are exposed to the ongoing Israeli–Palestinian conflict. It combines the original ERASE-Stress program with six additional modules focused on topics related to prosocial orientation, and aims to reduce PTSD, enhance resiliency, and develop prosocial skills. The program is rated Promising. The program was shown to statistically significant reduce PTSD severity, functional problems, anxiety, and somatic complaints. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Enhancing Resiliency Amongst Student Experiencing Stress (ERASE-Stress) in Israel |
|
Mental health, Children exposed to violence, Trauma, Treatment, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Schools | This intervention is a universal, school-based intervention for Jewish-Israeli students who are exposed to the ongoing violence of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. The program aims to reduce participants’ posttraumatic stress symptoms. The program is rated Promising. The program was shown to be statistically significant in reducing PTSD severity, functional problems, anxiety, and somatic complaints. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: The Incredible Years-Teacher Classroom Management Program |
|
School safety, Youth development, School climate, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Schools, Juvenile (under 18) | This is a preschool-based program designed to strengthen teachers’ classroom-management strategies and develop children’s social and problem-solving skills. The program is rated Promising. Across multiple measures, there was a statistically significant reduction in conduct problems and increase in prosocial behavior among participating children, compared with non-participating children. However, some measures showed no statistically significant effect of the program. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Behavior Intervention at Cook County (Ill.) Juvenile Temporary Detention Center (JTDC) |
|
Youth development, Treatment, Juvenile justice | This behavioral intervention targeted high-risk juvenile arrestees in a detention center in Chicago. The curriculum focused on correcting automatic or reactive behavior, with the goal of reducing both the probability and number of readmissions. The program is rated Promising. Participants were less likely to be readmitted and had fewer readmissions to the detention center, compared with non-participants. This difference was statistically significant. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Moms' Empowerment Program |
|
Children exposed to violence, Trauma, Violent crime, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This program provides support for mothers who have experienced intimate partner violence (IPV). The goal of the program is to assist mothers and ultimately improve their children’s adjustment. The program was rated Promising. Results showed a statistically significant improvement in children’s externalizing behaviors and attitudes about family violence, although there was no effect on children’s internalizing behaviors. Mothers in the program also experienced greater reductions in IPV over time. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: SAM (Solution, Action, Mentorship) Program for Adolescent Girls |
|
Girls, Schools, Substance abuse, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Juvenile delinquency | This is a school-based, substance-use-prevention program for adolescent girls, which uses solution-focused brief therapy and community and peer mentorship. The program is rated Promising. Program participation was shown to have a statistically significant effect on lowering drug use, improving social competence, increasing knowledge surrounding drug use, and increasing negative attitudes toward drug use. The program had no statistically significant effect on grade point average or self-esteem. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Ability School Engagement Program (Australia) |
|
Truancy, Schools, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This is a police–school partnership intervention that seeks to reduce antisocial and truant behaviors among youth and increase their willingness to attend school. This program is rated Promising. The results show a statistically significant positive effect on truancy for program participants. Students who participate in the program are less likely to miss school and more likely to report being willing to attend school, compared with students who do not participate. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Functional Family Parole |
|
Parole, Mental health, Reentry, Treatment, Juvenile detention, Juvenile justice, Child health and welfare, Employment initiatives, Juvenile (under 18) | This is a supervision program that incorporates family-focused, strengths-based principles of Functional Family Therapy. The goal of the program is to reduce re-arrests and increase employment rates. The program is rated Promising. Participants in the intervention were less likely to be re-arrested, more likely to be employed, and earned more per quarter, compared with the comparison group. These findings were statistically significant. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Check & Connect |
|
Dropout/expulsion, Truancy, Child health and welfare, School climate, Juvenile (under 18), Juvenile delinquency | This is a school-based, structured mentoring program designed to reduce school absences and promote student engagement. This program is rated No Effects. One study found students in the program had statistically significant fewer days absent and more days in school. However, program students also had statistically significant lower math scores. There were no other statistically significant differences in outcomes. A second study also found no statistically significant differences Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Gender-Responsive Intervention for Female Juvenile Offenders |
|
Girls, Mental health, Substance abuse, Reentry, Treatment, Probation, Community corrections, Corrections, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Juvenile delinquency, Juvenile detention | This program provided gender-responsive services in two group homes for female youths who had been adjudicated in the delinquency (formal probation) or truancy divisions of juvenile court. The program is rated Promising. Results showed a statistically significant difference in that the girls who received gender-responsive services had lower recidivism rates after 2 years, compared with the comparison group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Juvenile Restorative Justice Program (Midwest County) |
|
Juvenile courts, Diversion, Victims of crime | This program provides an alternative to juvenile court processing for youths with justice system contact who may or may not have a criminal record. The program is rated Promising. Although there was no statistically significant difference between the treatment and comparison groups on rates of official police contact, the average number of days to re-arrest was statistically significantly lower for the treatment group (441.7 days) than for the comparison group (254.1 days). Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Second Step for Elementary School (2011 Edition) |
|
Bullying, School safety, Youth development, Positive youth development, School climate, Schools, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This is a school-based, social–emotional learning program for elementary school students. Teachers incorporate 25-40-minute lessons within the usual classroom curriculum. The program is rated No Effects. The treatment group displayed a statistically significant reduction in hyperactivity; however, there were no statistically significant differences between the treatment and control groups on measures of conduct problems, peer problems, social–emotional competence, or disruptive behaviors. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Second Step: Student Success Through Prevention Middle School Program (2008 Edition) |
|
Bullying, School safety, Youth development, Positive youth development, School climate, Schools, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Victimization, Victims of crime | This is a universal, school-based social-emotional learning program aimed at reducing violence and encouraging academic success among middle school students. The program is rated No Effects. While the program had a statistically significant impact on reducing physical aggression, there was no statistically significant impact on sexual-violence victimization and perpetration, peer victimization, bullying victimization and perpetration, cyberbullying, or homophobic name calling. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Philadelphia (Penn.) Intensive Aftercare Probation Program |
|
Probation, Reentry, Violent offenders, Case Management, Corrections, Community corrections, Juvenile detention, Juvenile justice, Juvenile detention | This program was an intensive alternative reintegration program for high-risk male juveniles who were being released to probation from a juvenile corrections facility. The program is rated Promising. Results showed that while there were no differences between the treatment and comparison groups on the percent who had been re-arrested during the 9-month follow up, the treatment group had a statistically significantly lower number of re-arrests than the comparison group. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Violent Offender Treatment Program (VOTP) |
|
Violent offenders, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Corrections, Homicide, Violent crime, Juvenile detention, Juvenile justice | This treatment program aims to reduce recidivism among youths convicted of violent offenses and capital crimes (such as murder) in one southern state. The program offers six months of intensive, therapeutic treatment to juveniles in a residential facility before they are released. The program is rated Promising. Results showed a statistically significant difference in reduced recidivism rates for juveniles who participated in the program, compared with those who did not participate. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Skillman Intensive Aftercare Program (Pittsburgh and Detroit) |
|
Reentry, Case Management, Comprehensive/wraparound services, Juvenile detention, Juvenile justice, Juvenile (under 18) | This was an aftercare program in Pittsburgh (Penn.) and Detroit (Mich.) for juveniles transitioning out of a residential correctional program. The intent of the program was to decrease instances of reconviction and re-arrest among participating youths after their release into the community. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant effects on rates of reconviction and rearrest among program participants in either city. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Avon Park Youth Academy and STREET Smart Aftercare Program |
|
Training, Mental health, Diversion, Intake/assessment, Jobs and workforce development, Young juvenile offenders, Access to education, Reentry, Corrections, Correctional facilities, Juvenile detention, Juvenile justice, Inmate assistance programs, Employment initiatives | This program was located at a secure-custody residential facility that provided educational and vocational training to moderate-risk male youth. The program is rated No Effects. Participants showed a statistically significant greater likelihood of obtaining a degree, compared with nonparticipants. However, there were no statistically significant differences in any arrest for any offense overall and felony arrest specifically, employment, time employed, or higher education enrollment. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Wayne County (Michigan) Second Chance Reentry Program |
|
Mental health, Reentry, Case Management, Comprehensive/wraparound services, Corrections, Inmate programs, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Juvenile detention, Juvenile justice | This is a reentry program designed to reduce recidivism and increase reentry services for males, ages 13 to 18, who have committed offenses and are placed in a locked, residential treatment facility. The program is rated Promising. The program was shown to statistically significantly decrease recidivism rates among youths who participated in the program, compared with youths who received services as usual. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Promotor Pathway Program |
|
Schools, Child health and welfare, Juvenile delinquency | This is a program that uses a caring adult, called a Promotor, to provide case management, mentoring, and advocacy for youths. This program is rated No Effects. The intervention had statistically significant positive effects on school enrollment, housing stability, and births, but had statistically significant negative effects on getting into a fight and binge drinking. There were no effects on employment, carrying a weapon, incarceration, marijuana use, or perception of control of one’s life. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: SOURCE (Student Outreach for College Enrollment) Program |
|
Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Campus Crime, Campus, Crime prevention, Juvenile delinquency | This was a mentoring program in which high school juniors had regularly scheduled one-on-one contacts with trained college advisors to increase college attendance rates. The program is rated No Effects. The program was shown to have small positive effects on enrollment rates and number of months enrolled in California State University and University of California campuses, but did not have statistically significant effects on 2-year, 4-year, or overall college enrollment or months of attendance. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Academic Mentoring Program for Educational Development (AMPED) |
|
Youth development, Positive youth development, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Mental health, Juvenile delinquency | This is a school-based, mentoring program designed to improve academic performance and life satisfaction and reduce absences and behavioral infractions. The program is rated Promising. Participants had a statistically significant decrease in unexcused absences and higher math and English grades, compared with the control group. However, there were no effects on school-reported behavioral infractions, science or history grades, positive affect, negative affect, coping, or overall mental health. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Bounce Back |
|
Mental health, Children exposed to violence, Trauma, Treatment, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18) | This is a cognitive-behavioral intervention for children who have been exposed to traumatic events, and for their parents. The goal is to help children improve their symptoms of posttraumatic stress, depression, and anxiety. The program is rated Promising. Children who received the treatment demonstrated statistically significant improvements on measures of posttraumatic stress, anxiety symptoms, and emotional regulation; however, there was no impact on measures of depression or coping efficacy. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Green Dot Intervention Program |
|
Dating violence, Campus Crime, Drug-Related Victimization, School climate, Rape and sexual assault, Violent crime, Crime prevention, Victimization, Victims of crime, Juvenile (under 18) | This program is designed to increase active-bystander behaviors and reduce dating and sexual violence in college and high school students. The program is rated Promising. Students who participated in the program had a statistically significantly greater number of observed and self-reported active-bystander behaviors than students who did not participate. However, there was no statistically significant impact on sexual violence victimization or sexual harassment. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Tulsa (OK) Family Drug Court |
|
Alcohol-Related Offenses, Drug courts, Family courts, Family reunification, Foster care/child welfare system, Problem-solving courts, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Drugs, Drug treatment | This is a treatment court dedicated to cases of child abuse and neglect, in which parental substance abuse is one of the primary reasons for child welfare involvement. The program provides parenting training in conjunction with substance abuse treatment to increase the likelihood of reunification. The program is rated Effective. Families who received services through the Family Drug Court were statistically significantly more likely to reunify than comparison families. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Cognitive-Behavioral Intervention for Children with Emotional and Behavioral Disturbances |
|
Mental health, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Juvenile delinquency | This cognitive–behavioral mentoring intervention was designed to improve child behavior and family functioning among 8- to 12-year olds with mental health disorders, and their primary caregivers. This program is rated Promising. There were statistically significant differences between the intervention and control groups on measures of child behavior, parenting stress, perceived social support, and attachment to parents. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Cognitive-Behavioral, Group-Mentoring Intervention for Children with Emotional and Behavioral Disturbances |
|
Mental health, Juvenile delinquency, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18) | This cognitive–behavioral, group-mentoring intervention was designed to improve child behavior and family functioning among 8- to 12-year olds with mental health disorders, and their primary caregivers. This program is rated Promising. Although there were statistically significant improvements on measures of social problem solving and behavior problems, there were no improvements on measures of social skills among children in the intervention group, compared with the control group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Challenging Horizons Program - Mentoring Version (CHP-Mentoring) |
|
Mental health, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Juvenile delinquency | This is a school-based intervention designed to help students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) develop, practice, and generalize academic and social skills by using volunteer mentors to deliver skills training to students. This program is rated as No Effects. Academic functioning and parent/teacher ratings of student behavior reflecting ADHD symptoms did not differ statistically significantly for youths in the intervention group, compared with the control group. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Early Start to Emancipation Preparation - Tutoring Program |
|
Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Juvenile delinquency | This is a tutoring intervention designed to improve reading and math skills among 14- to 15-year old youths in foster care who were 1 to 3 years behind grade level in reading and/or math. The program also aimed to build a mentoring relationship between the youth and the tutor and provide access to independent living workshops. This program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences between the intervention and control groups on any of the outcomes assessed. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Challenging Horizons Program - After-School Version (CHP-After School) |
|
Mental health, Afterschool, Schools, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Juvenile delinquency | This is an after-school intervention designed to help students with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) develop, practice, and generalize academic and social skills by using volunteer mentors to deliver skills training to students. This program is rated as No Effects. Academic functioning and parent/teacher ratings of student behavior reflecting ADHD symptoms did not differ statistically significantly between youths in the intervention group and those in the control group. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Home-Visiting Program for Adolescent Mothers |
|
Girls, Mental health, Dropout/expulsion, Home visiting, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Intimate partner violence | This is a community-based program in which adolescent mothers had meetings with trained home visitors, who delivered a parenting and an adolescent curriculum. This program is rated Promising. Treatment group participants demonstrated statistically significantly improvements in parenting skills and school status compared with the control group. However, there was no statistically significant impact on depressive symptoms, condom and hormonal contraceptive use, or repeat pregnancies. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: School-Based Expressive Writing Intervention for At-Risk Urban Adolescents |
|
Children exposed to violence, Trauma, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18) | This was a school-based intervention targeting at-risk, seventh-grade students. The intervention included either a standard expressive-writing condition or an enhanced expressive-writing condition. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences between the standard writing treatment condition, the enhanced writing treatment condition, and the control condition on self- and teacher-reported measures of aggression and teacher-reported emotion regulation. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Better Futures Program |
|
Mental health, Mentoring, Child health and welfare | This is a program designed to help young people in foster care and with serious mental health challenges prepare for postsecondary education. The program is rated Effective. Youths who received the intervention had statistically significant improvements on self-determination, mental health empowerment, transition planning, career self-efficacy, hope, barriers to education, postsecondary preparation, and transition planning, but not on quality of life or mental health recovery. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: A Stop Smoking in Schools Trial (ASSIST) Program |
|
Schools, Substance abuse, Legal substances, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18) | This in-school smoking prevention program was designed to spread and sustain norms of non-smoking behavior among 12–13 year olds, using influential peer opinion leaders. The program is rated No Effects. Youths who received the intervention did not differ statistically significantly from youths who did not receive the intervention in their odds of smoking in the last week, at 2 years post-intervention. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Juvenile Breaking the Cycle (JBTC) Program (Lane County, Oregon) |
|
Drug courts, Juvenile courts, Marijuana, Alcohol, Mental health, Substance abuse, Diversion, Case Management, Treatment, Young juvenile offenders, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Diversion, Legal substances, Drugs, Drug treatment | Using comprehensive assessments, the program identified, provided, and coordinated individualized services for high-risk, drug-involved, justice-involved juveniles. This program is rated Effective. Results suggest that JBTC participants were significantly less likely to recidivate and had statistically significantly fewer arrests, compared with non-JBTC participants. However, the impact on self-reported drug use was mixed. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Risk Detection/Executive Function Intervention |
|
Girls, Dating violence, Foster care/child welfare system, Victims of crime, Victimization, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Intimate partner violence, Violent crime, Crime prevention | This is a program for adolescent females with a history of violence/abuse and involvement in the child welfare system. The goal of the program was to reduce re-victimization in teen dating situations. The program used mindfulness-based, cognitive interventions to build skills for responding to risky situations (including reasoning and problem solving). The program is rated Promising. The intervention was shown to statistically significantly reduce sexual and physical re-victimization. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Social Learning/Feminist Intervention |
|
Girls, Dating violence, Foster care/child welfare system, Victimization, Victims of crime, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Violent crime, Crime prevention, Rape and sexual assault | This is a 12-session program for adolescent females with a history of exposure to violence/abuse and involvement in the child welfare system. The goal of the program was to reduce re-victimization in teen dating situations. The program used a health-promotion approach to help girls develop healthy relationships. The program is rated Promising. The intervention had a statistically significant impact on reducing physical re-victimization, but not sexual re-victimization. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Sources of Strength |
|
Mental health, Suicide, School climate, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Mentoring | This is a school-based, suicide prevention program designed to build socioecological-protective influences across a full student population, using youth opinion leaders from diverse social cliques to develop and deliver messaging aimed at changing the norms and behaviors of their peers. This program is rated Promising. Peer leaders in the intervention schools showed statistically significant improvements on perceptions and behaviors pertaining to suicide and on social connectedness. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Youth Relationships Project |
|
Dating violence, Children exposed to violence, Youth development, Victimization, Intimate partner violence, Violent crime, Crime prevention | This was a community-based prevention program that targeted youth at risk of becoming involved in abusive relationships. The program was rated Promising. Treatment group youth demonstrated statistically significant reductions in physical abuse perpetration and trauma symptoms and a lower likelihood of emotional abuse and threatening behavior victimization, compared with control group youth. However, there were no differences between groups in threatening behavior perpetration or hostility. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: The Urban Debate League for High School Students |
|
Dropout/expulsion, Youth development, Afterschool, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18) | This is a competitive, social-policy debate program to advance academic achievement, community contributions, and life success of students in grades 9 to 12 in urban school districts. The program is rated Promising. The program was shown to have a statistically significant, positive effect on high school graduation and college readiness, as indicated by ACT scores. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Reading for Life (RFL) |
|
Juvenile courts, Diversion, Young juvenile offenders, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Prosecution, Juvenile delinquency | This is a diversion program in which juveniles ages 13–18, who have committed non-violent offenses, study works of literature and classic virtue theory in small groups, led by trained volunteer mentors. The goal is to foster moral development and reduce recidivism. The program is rated Promising. Participants had a statistically significantly lower chance of being prosecuted for any offense (including misdemeanors and felonies) and fewer arrests than the comparison group. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Red Hook Community Justice Center: Criminal Court for Adults |
|
Administrative Employees, Restitution, Community courts, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Sanctions | This is a problem-solving community court that seeks to prevent crime. One component of the program, the Criminal Court, hears misdemeanor cases and seeks to provide quick and meaningful sanctions to defendants in the Red Hook neighborhood of Brooklyn, New York. The program was rated Promising. The program had a statistically significant impact on recidivism rates for defendants. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: PROmoting School-Community-University Partnerships to Enhance Resilience (PROSPER) |
|
Schools, Marijuana, Alcohol, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Positive youth development, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Methamphetamine, Illegal substances, Drugs | This is a community-based program that was designed to address substance abuse and antisocial behavior. The program is rated Promising. Students in the schools that implemented the PROSPER model had statistically significant fewer conduct problems and lower lifetime illicit substance use, compared with students in control schools. However, there were no statistically significant impacts on driving after drinking alcohol or frequency of drunkenness. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Abecedarian Project |
|
Home visiting, Positive youth development, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Drugs, Substance abuse, Cocaine, Illegal substances | This was an early education intervention designed to improve cognitive and educational development among low-income children. The program is rated Promising. The treatment group showed a statistically significant greater likelihood of being enrolled in college and having held skilled employment, a lower likelihood of being a teen parent, and fewer depressive symptoms, compared with the control group. However, there were no statistically significant differences in incarceration or drug use. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Baltimore County (Md.) Juvenile Drug Court |
|
Drug courts, Juvenile courts, Alcohol-Related Offenses, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Diversion, Treatment, Problem-solving courts, Drug treatment | This program represents an alternative to traditional processing in the juvenile justice system. Rather than going through court processing, youth with substance-abuse problems are placed in treatment. The goal is to reduce their use of drugs and criminal behavior. The program is rated Promising. At the 2-year follow up, program participants had fewer overall and drug-related rearrests, compared with a matched comparison group. These differences were statistically significant. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Classroom-Centered Intervention to Reduce Risk of Substance Use |
|
Schools, Substance abuse, Youth development, Positive youth development, School climate, Drug abuse prevention and education, Drugs, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Alcohol, Legal substances | This program was a preventive intervention for first-grade students, which was designed to reduce substance use risk by improving teachers’ behavior-management skills and enhancing classroom curricula. The program is rated Promising. Overall, results were mixed. The treatment group showed a statistically significant lower likelihood of self-reporting initiation of tobacco use and other drugs, compared with the control group. The program had no statistically significant impact on alcohol, mariju Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Family-School Partnership Intervention to Reduce Risk of Substance Use |
|
Schools, Substance abuse, Youth development, Positive youth development, School climate, Drug abuse prevention and education, Drugs, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Alcohol, Legal substances | The program was a universal, preventive intervention for first-grade students, designed to reduce the risk for substance use by improving teachers’ and parents’ communication and behavior-management skills. The program is rated Promising. Approximately 6 to 7 years after the program, participants showed a statistically significant lower likelihood of having initiated tobacco use, compared with nonparticipants. The program had no impact on alcohol, marijuana, inhalant, or other drug use. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Special Needs Diversionary Program (SNDP) |
|
Juvenile courts, Mental health, Diversion, Case Management, Youth development, Treatment, Probation, Corrections, Community corrections | This is a diversion program that provides intensive supervision and treatment for juveniles on probation who suffer from mental illness. This program is rated Promising. The intervention group showed a statistically significant reduction in number of rearrests within 1 year, compared with the comparison group. However, there was no statistically significant impact on time to rearrest. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Prime Time |
|
Girls, Juvenile health, Mental health, Dropout/expulsion, Truancy, Dating violence, Youth development, Positive youth development, Treatment, Victimization, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Schools, Victims of crime | The program aims to reduce precursors of teen pregnancy, including sexual risk behaviors, involvement in violence, and disconnection from school. The program is rated No Effects. There was a statistically significant impact on consistency of condom use and relational aggression perpetration, but there was no statistically significant impact on physical violence victimization, relational violence victimization, stress management, interpersonal skills, or fight avoidance skills. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Cross-Age Peer Mentoring Program |
|
Afterschool, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Juvenile delinquency | The program is a school-based peer mentoring program in which high school students provide one-on-one mentoring to late elementary and early middle school students. This program is rated Promising. The mentored children showed statistically significant improvement on measures of spelling achievement and connectedness to school and to parents compared with the control group. However, mentored and control group children did not significantly differ on connectedness to reading, future, or friends. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: The RULER Approach |
|
School safety, Youth development, School climate, Schools, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This program is a multiyear classroom curriculum for kindergarten through eighth grade incorporating professional development for teachers, school staff, and leaders with literacy-based, skill-building, social–emotional learning programs. This program is rated Promising. The program had statistically significant effects on emotional support, positive classroom climate, and emotion-focused interactions. However, there were no effects on negative classroom climate and classroom supportiveness. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Juvenile Justice Assessment Planning Referral Placement (JARPP) |
|
Training, Parole, Probation, Personnel, Treatment, Case Management, Corrections, Community corrections, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Juvenile delinquency, Juvenile detention, Drugs, Substance abuse | This is a training program for juvenile justice probation/parole case managers (PCMs), to promote their use of evidence-based practices to identify the mental health and substance use needs of delinquent youth and increase youth’s access to services. The program is rated Promising. There were statistically significant reductions in re-referral and placement rates for youth whose PCMs received the enhanced training, compared with youth whose PCMs received the standard training or no training. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Social Aggression Prevention Program (SAPP) |
|
Juvenile health, Mental health, School safety, Youth development, Positive youth development, School climate, Bullying, Schools, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18) | This is a school-based, small-group program designed to prevent social aggression and increase empathy, prosocial behavior, and social problem–solving skills among fifth-grade females. The program is rated No Effects. Through treatment group, students demonstrated some statistically significantly improved social problem–solving skills, compared with control group students. There was no effect on prosocial behavior or social aggression. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Eisenhower Quantum Opportunities |
|
Dropout/expulsion, Positive youth development, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18) | Also known as the Eisenhower Foundation’s Quantum Opportunities Program, this program is an intensive, year-round, multicomponent intervention for high-risk minority students from inner-city neighborhoods, which is provided throughout all 4 years of high school. The program is rated Effective. Program participants had statistically significantly higher grade point averages, high school graduation rates, and college acceptance rates as compared with control group youths. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Pre-K RECAP |
|
Juvenile health, Mental health, School safety, Youth development, Positive youth development, School climate, Bullying, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18) | This is a semi-structured, school-based intervention program developed for pre-kindergarten students seeking to improve emotional and behavioral problems and promote social skills development. The program is rated Promising. Evaluation results showed no differences regarding parent-rated behavioral problems or social skill, but teacher ratings of child behavioral problems and social skills statistically significantly improved in the intervention group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Experience Corps |
|
Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Juvenile delinquency | This is a tutoring and mentoring program to improve the literacy outcomes of elementary school-aged children at risk of academic failure. This program is rated Promising. Program participants made statistically significantly greater gains in reading comprehension scores and teacher-assessed reading skills over an academic year, as compared with the control group. However, there were no differences in vocabulary and word attack scores from pre- to postintervention. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: School Health Center Healthy Adolescents Relationships Program (SHARP) |
|
Dating violence, Mental health, School safety, Children exposed to violence, Trauma, Treatment, Youth development, School climate, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18) | This is a high school-based, relationship abuse prevention program. The goal of the program was to identify students’ knowledge of abusive behaviors and teach them about relationship abuse and resources for its prevention. The program was rated No Effects. There was no statistically significant impact on recognition, use, and knowledge of adolescent relationship abuse resources, and intentions to intervene, but participants had greater increases in recognition of sexual coercion. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: An E-mentoring Program for Secondary Students with Learning Disabilities |
|
Positive youth development, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Juvenile delinquency | This program was designed to help high school students with mild learning disabilities improve their ability to identify postsecondary career goals. This program is rated Promising. The program group showed statistically significant improvement in social connectedness, transition competency, and self-determination, compared with the control group. However, there were no statistically significant differences in career/educational goals, academic connectedness, and familial connectedness. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Fostering Healthy Futures® for Preteens |
|
Juvenile health, Mental health, Children exposed to violence, Trauma, Treatment, Case Management, Family reunification, Foster care/child welfare system, Youth development, Positive youth development, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18) | This is a positive youth development program for preadolescent children (ages 9-11) who have current or previous child welfare involvement due to one or more adverse childhood experiences. The program is rated Promising. Children who participated in the program displayed statistically significant reductions in posttraumatic stress symptoms, dissociation symptoms, and scores on key mental health outcomes, compared with children in the control group. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Tri-Ministry Study |
|
Juvenile health, Mental health, School safety, Youth development, Positive youth development, Juvenile (under 18), Schools, Child health and welfare | This is a school-based trial that incorporated three programs: a Classwide Social Skills Program, a Connections Partner Reading Program, and a combination of both programs. The program is rated No Effects. There were statistically significant improvements on teacher- and parent-rated measures of externalizing problems. But there were no statistically significant effects on inappropriate classroom behavior and teacher- and parent-rated social skills. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: CHOICE |
|
Schools, Alcohol, Underage drinking, School safety, Afterschool, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Substance abuse, Legal substances, Drugs | This is a voluntary afterschool program for middle school aged youths to inform them about substance use and prevent them from starting or continuing alcohol use. The program is rated No Effects. The program was shown to have a statistically significant effect on delaying the initiation of alcohol use, but not on other measures of past or future alcohol use. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Stop School Bullying (Greece) |
|
Bullying, Juvenile health, Mental health, School safety, Youth development, Positive youth development, Schools, Victimization, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Victims of crime | This is a preventative, school-based program for students in 4th, 5th, and 6th grades (ages 9–12) that sought to reduce rates of bullying and victimization within elementary schools. The program is rated Effective. Evaluation results suggest that the program statistically significantly reduced bullying and victimization rates at schools that implemented the program compared with a control group of schools that did not. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Moving to Opportunity Demonstration Program |
|
Crime prevention, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Juvenile delinquency, Drugs, Violent crime | This is a housing mobility demonstration program intended to help move families from high-poverty public housing to low-poverty private housing to improve their lives. This program is rated No Effects. The program was shown to have no statistically significant long-term effects on violent, property, drug, or general crime arrests. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Ending Violence |
|
Dating violence, School safety, Coping, School climate, Victimization, Schools, Juvenile (under 18), Victims of crime | This is a school-based education program designed to teach students the warning signs of dating violence. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant impacts on perceptions of helpfulness in others, likelihood of seeking help, perpetration, victimization, and abusive or fearful dating experiences. However, there was a statistically significant increase in knowledge of dating violence in treatment group students. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: WITS Primary Program |
|
Bullying, School safety, Positive youth development, School climate, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Victimization, Victims of crime | This is a community-based, schoolwide intervention aimed at children in grades 1 through 3 that targets socially competent behaviors and risks for peer victimization. The program was rated Promising. The program was shown to have statistically significant, positive effects on physical and relational victimization and social competence, but not on social responsibility or physical aggression. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Peer Group Connection (PGC) Program |
|
Truancy, Youth development, Positive youth development, School climate, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Juvenile delinquency | A high school transition program that targets ninth-grade students who are at risk of dropping out. Its goal is to improve high school graduation rates. This program is rated No Effects. The program did not have a statistically significant overall effect on students’ high school graduation rates or on several other measures (such as credits earned). There was a statistically significant positive effect on school attachment. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: The GREAT School Program |
|
School safety, School climate, Schools, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This is a school-based intervention designed to promote nonviolent goals and beliefs and to discourage aggression. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant impacts on individual norms for aggression or nonviolence, goals and strategies supporting aggression or nonviolence, or beliefs supporting fighting or nonviolence. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Bully-Proofing Your School |
|
Bullying, School safety, Positive youth development, Schools, Victimization, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Victims of crime | This is a school-based intervention program focused on reducing instances of bullying and victimization, while increasing the safety of students in grades 3–5. The program is rated Promising. In all outcomes, the treatment schools showed statistically significant reductions in bullying, victimization, and witnessed aggression, as well as statistically significant increases in perceptions of safety at school. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: INSIGHTS into Children's Temperament |
|
School safety, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This is a school-based intervention program delivered to urban elementary students, with the participation of parents and teachers, to address disruptive behaviors. The program was rated Effective. In both studies, authors found that the intervention had a statistically significant effect on behavior problems exhibited by children. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Prevention Program for Externalizing Problem Behavior (PEP) |
|
School safety, Positive youth development, Juvenile delinquency, Crime prevention, Juvenile (under 18) | The program is a preventative, group-based training intervention for parents and kindergarten teachers of young children with externalizing problem behaviors. The program seeks to reduce problem behaviors and ultimately prevent delinquency later in life. The program is rated Promising. Treatment group mothers and teachers reported statistically significantly fewer child problem behaviors, compared with the control group. However, there was no effect of observer-rated problem behaviors. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Achievement Mentoring Program (AMP) |
|
Dropout/expulsion, Positive youth development, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Juvenile delinquency | This is an intervention for urban minority freshmen at risk of dropping out of high school. The goal was to enhance school-related cognitions and behaviors. The program is rated Promising. The program did not statistically significantly impact students’ absences, grade point averages, or decision-making efficacy, but had statistically significant effects on discipline referrals, negative school behavior, performance in mathematics and language arts, and other self-reported outcomes. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: It's Your Game... Keep It Real |
|
School safety, Dating violence, Victimization, Schools, Juvenile (under 18), Intimate partner violence, Violent crime, Crime prevention, Victims of crime | A health education program for 7th and 8th graders designed to delay sexual behavior and promote healthy dating relationships. The program is rated Promising. The program was shown to statistically significantly reduce emotional and physical dating violence victimization. However, the program did not have a statistically significant effect on physical perpetration of dating violence. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Family Check-Up (FCU) for Adolescents |
|
Positive youth development, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Mental health, Alcohol, Legal substances, Drugs | This is a family-centered intervention designed to assist families with high-risk adolescents. The goal is to reduce the growth of adolescents’ problem behaviors and substance abuse. The program is rated Promising. Participants showed statistically significantly less growth of antisocial behavior and in alcohol, tobacco, and marijuana use compared with the control group. Participants also had stable GPAs from the start of middle school into high school and fewer school absences. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Red Hook Community Justice Center: Family Court for Juveniles |
|
Administrative Employees, Restitution, Family courts, Treatment, Problem-solving courts, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Juvenile justice | This is a problem-solving community court that seeks to prevent crime. One component of the program, the Family Court, hears juvenile delinquency cases involving youth aged 15 or younger, with the goal of responding to the specific needs of youth in the Red Hook neighborhood of Brooklyn, New York. The program was rated No Effects. The program had no significant effect on recidivism rates for juvenile defendants. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Comer's School Development Program |
|
Schools, Marijuana, Alcohol, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, School safety, School climate, Juvenile (under 18), School climate | This is a school-based intervention involving administrators, teachers, staff, and parents that aims to improve relationships and school climate to enhance student achievement. The program is rated Promising. Students in treatment schools reported statistically significant reductions in the frequency of angry feelings and acting out, and greater disapproval of misbehavior, compared with students in control schools. There were no statistically significant differences in substance use. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Keep Cool...Start at School |
|
School safety, School climate, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Schools | This is a social, cognitive–behavioral treatment program that targeted children ages 8 to 12 who exhibited disruptive or aggressive behavior and conduct disorder. The program is rated No Effects. Overall, the evidence from the evaluation found that students who participated in the intervention did not statistically significantly differ from those students in the waitlist control group on measures of conduct disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, and externalization of behaviors. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Juvenile Transfer to Adult Court (Pennsylvania) |
|
Juvenile courts, Violent offenders, Recidivism, Crime prevention | Transfer of serious and violent juveniles from juvenile court to adult court based on criteria, such as age, seriousness of offense, and use of a deadly weapon. The program is rated No Effects. The preponderance of the evidence suggests that transferring juveniles to adult court had no impact on measures of arrests. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Juvenile Drug Courts With Contingency Management and Multisystemic Therapy |
|
Drug courts, Juvenile courts, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Problem-solving courts, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Corrections, Juvenile delinquency, Juvenile justice, Alcohol, Legal substances | This program incorporates contingency management protocols and multisystemic therapy into traditional juvenile drug court services to provide juveniles and families with additional engagement opportunities and support to reduce recidivism and substance abuse. The program is rated Promising. The program statistically significantly reduced alcohol and poly drug use, positive drug urine screens, status offenses, and property offenses. The program had mixed effects on marijuana use and offenses. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Public School Choice Lottery (Charlotte-Mecklenburg, N.C., School District) |
|
Dropout/expulsion, School climate, Juvenile (under 18) | This program consisted of an open-enrollment school choice plan in the Charlotte–Mecklenburg, N.C., School District, which was designed to offer slots at oversubscribed schools through a lottery-based system. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences between middle or high school students who won the lottery and middle or high school students who did not win the lottery in number of drug, property, or violent felony arrests, at the 7-year follow up. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Boys Town Family Home Program |
|
Family reunification, Youth development, Alternative schools, Child health and welfare | This is a residential program that focuses on improving behavioral and academic skills in a family-style setting with the goal of family reunification. The program is rated Promising. Participants showed a statistically significant increase in their grade point averages and perceptions of the importance of going to college, compared with the control group. However, the program did not show an impact on the years of school completed or likelihood of receiving a high school diploma or GED. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Brief Instrumental School-Based Mentoring Program |
|
Youth development, Positive youth development, Schools, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Juvenile delinquency | This is a school-based program designed for at-risk middle school students that aims to improve academic performance, promote school connectedness, and decrease disciplinary actions. The program is rated No Effects. There was no statistically significant impact on students’ English, reading, or science grades; measures of school connectedness; or school absences. However, treatment group students had statistically significantly fewer discipline referrals compared with control group students. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Youth-Nominated Support Team-Version II (YST-II) |
|
Mental health, Suicide, Treatment, Child health and welfare, Alcohol, Substance abuse, Legal substances, Drugs, Juvenile (under 18), Drug treatment | This program was designed to provide adult support to suicidal youth following psychiatric care. The program is rated Promising. Program participants showed statistically significant improvements on mortality, suicide and drug-related deaths, outpatient psychotherapy sessions, medication follow-up sessions, and outpatient drug or alcohol treatment but not on suicidal ideation, suicide, depression, negative attitudes about the future, functional impairment, or inpatient drug or alcohol treatment. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Utah Juvenile Drug Courts |
|
Alcohol-Related Offenses, Drug courts, Juvenile courts, Drug possession, Alcohol, Treatment, Problem-solving courts, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Juvenile delinquency, Juvenile justice, Juvenile (under 18), Legal substances, Drug treatment | This is a juvenile drug court designed to reduce alcohol and other drug and delinquency offenses through an accountability framework. The program is rated Promising. Treatment group participants were statistically significantly less likely to recidivate in delinquency/criminal offenses, compared with the comparison group participants. However, there was no statistically significant effect on alcohol and other drug recidivism. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Jefferson County Community Partnership (Birmingham, Ala.) |
|
Juvenile health, Mental health, Case Management, Comprehensive/wraparound services, Diversion, Juvenile justice, Child health and welfare, Juvenile detention | Offers a wide array of services for youth with serious emotional disturbances to reduce youth's contact with the juvenile justice system. The services are accessible, community-based, individualized, culturally competent, and include an individual’s family in the planning and delivery of treatment. The program is rated Promising. The program was shown to statistically significantly reduce youths’ contact with the juvenile justice system. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Ecologically Based Family Therapy (EBFT) for Substance-Abusing Runaway Adolescents |
|
Marijuana, Alcohol, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Family reunification, Treatment, Legal substances, Drugs, Juvenile (under 18), Drug treatment | This is a home-based, family preservation model for families in crisis because a youth has run away from home. The model targets 12- to 17-year-olds who are staying in a runaway shelter and dealing with substance abuse issues. The program is rated Promising. Treatment group adolescents reported a statistically significant reduction in the percentage of days they used alcohol or drugs, compared with control group adolescents who received services as usual, at the 15-month follow up. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Movimiento Ascendencia (Pueblo, Colo.) |
|
Girls, Gang Crime, Youth gangs, Weapons violations, Assault, Afterschool, Drug abuse prevention and education, Drugs, Crime prevention, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | A culturally focused, gender-specific program that provides young females, primarily Mexican American, alternatives to substance abuse and gang involvement. The program is rated Promising. The program significantly reduced self-reports of damaging property; stealing more than $50; and buying, selling, or holding stolen goods. However, it had no impact on self-esteem, grades in school, concealing of weapons, and stealing less than $50. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: National Guard ChalleNGe Program |
|
Substance abuse, Dropout/expulsion, Youth development, Jobs and workforce development, Positive youth development, Juvenile delinquency, Juvenile (under 18), Crime prevention, Child health and welfare, Employment initiatives | An intensive residential program that provides training and services, including structured one-on-one mentoring, to at-risk youth (ages 16 to 18 years). This program is rated No Effects. The program had a statistically significant, positive impact on employment and GED attainment among participating youth as compared with control group youth. However, the program had no effect on youths’ frequency of arrests, marijuana or other illegal drug use, delinquent behavior, or psychological distress. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: KEEP SAFE |
|
Girls, Marijuana, Alcohol, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Foster care/child welfare system, Juvenile delinquency, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Crime prevention, Legal substances, Drugs | This was a multicomponent intervention to prevent delinquency and substance misuse for girls in foster care transitioning from elementary school to middle school. The program is rated Promising. Treatment group girls reported statistically significantly reduced tobacco use, marijuana use, and delinquent behavior, compared with control group girls. However, there was no statistically significant impact on alcohol use or association with delinquent peers. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Rochester Resilience Project (RRP) |
|
Mental health, Substance abuse, School safety, Youth development, Positive youth development, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Juvenile delinquency, Drugs | This is a school-based intervention to improve the social-emotional and behavioral skills of young children at risk for mental health disorders and substance abuse. This program is rated Promising. The program had a statistically significant, positive effect on children’s task orientation, behavior control, assertiveness, and peer social skills. The program was also associated with a statistically significant decline in the average number of suspensions and office disciplinary referrals. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Adults in the Making (AIM) |
|
Alcohol, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Positive youth development, Legal substances, Drugs | This is a family-centered intervention designed to deter alcohol and substance use and reduce risk-taking behaviors of youth. The program is rated Effective. Treatment group participants reported statistically significantly greater reduction in risk behaviors and greater reduced impact of life stress on risk behaviors, compared with comparison group participants. However, there was no statistically significant impact on alcohol use, substance use, or cognitive susceptibility. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: School-Based Mentoring Program for At-Risk Middle School Youth |
|
Truancy, Youth development, Schools, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Juvenile delinquency | This program offered one-to-one mentoring to at-risk students in 7th to 9th grades in an urban middle school setting to reduce their discipline referrals and school absences and to improve their school connectedness. This program is rated Promising. The program was associated with a statistically significant decline in the number of office disciplinary referrals and a statistically significant increase in school connectedness. However, the program had no impact on unexcused absences. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Adolescent Diversion Program (New York State) |
|
Jails, Correctional facilities, Corrections, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Courts, Diversion, Sentencing | This is a diversion program for 16- and 17-year-old defendants in the New York state adult criminal justice system. The program is rated Promising. Similar rates of recidivism were found for participants and comparison group members, which suggests that diverting older adolescents does not increase the risk of recidivism and risk to the public. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Front-End Diversion Initiative |
|
Diversion, Personnel, Probation, Community corrections, Corrections | This is a preadjudication diversion program designed to divert juveniles with mental health needs away from the juvenile justice system through specialized supervision and case management. The program is rated Promising. Participants were statistically significantly less likely to face adjudication compared to those who only received traditional supervision while on probation. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Too Good for Drugs - Elementary School |
|
Schools, Alcohol, Prescription drugs, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Youth development, Positive youth development, Drug abuse prevention and education, Drugs, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18) | This is a school-based drug prevention program designed to reduce students’ intention to use alcohol, tobacco, and illegal drugs and promote prosocial attitudes, skills, and behaviors. The program is rated No Effects. There were mixed findings in students’ self-reported emotional competency skills, social and resistance skills, and perceptions of the harmful effects of drugs. There were also no statistically significant impacts on students’ attitudes toward drugs. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: SCARE Program |
|
Positive youth development, Schools, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This is a school-based program on anger and aggression management for children and adolescents, especially those at risk for academic and behavioral problems. The program is designed to teach youth about emotions and help them recognize alternatives to violent behavior and aggressive responses. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences between the treatment and comparison groups in anger control, state anger, or trait anger, at the 8-week follow up. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: California's Repeat Offender Prevention Program (ROPP) |
|
Probation, Truancy, Case Management, Comprehensive/wraparound services, Young juvenile offenders, Probation, Corrections, Community corrections, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Intimate partner violence | This is a supervision program for high-risk youths. The program is rated No Effects. Participants had a statistically significant decrease in the number of felony petitions, compared with the control group; however, there were no differences in petitions for new offenses, misdemeanor petitions, warrant status, days spent in custody, GPA, classes passed, classes failed, or number of days of school attended. There were also mixed findings on petitions for probation violations. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Social Decision Making/Problem Solving Program |
|
Mental health, Substance abuse, Youth development, Positive youth development, School climate, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This is a prevention program targeted at middle school students, which is designed to reduce stressors by teaching coping and decision-making skills. The program is rated Promising. Students who participated in the intervention demonstrated a statistically significant greater level of coping skills to reduce stressors, compared with students who did not receive any intervention. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Project BUILD |
|
Youth gangs, Violent offenders, Young juvenile offenders, Alternative schools, School climate, Access to education, Inmate programs, Recidivism, Corrections, Crime prevention, Juvenile detention, Drugs, Substance abuse, Intimate partner violence | This program comprises a violence prevention curriculum, which is designed to assist youth in detention to overcome obstacles such as gangs, violence, crime, and substance abuse. The program is rated Effective. Treatment group youth who participated in the program had lower rates of recidivism and took a longer amount of time to recidivate, compared with control group youth, at the 1-year follow up. These differences were statistically significant. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Reconnecting Youth |
|
Schools, Mental health, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Truancy, Suicide, Youth development, Juvenile delinquency, Juvenile (under 18), Crime prevention, Child health and welfare, Alcohol, Legal substances, Drugs | This is a school-based prevention program designed for high-risk students. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences between experimental group youth and control group youth in engagement in delinquency, alcohol use, smoking, GPA, anger, and school connectedness. There were also statistically significant negative program effects for experimental group youth in conventional peer bonding and peer high-risk behavior. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Family Solutions Program (FSP) |
|
Mental health, Recidivism, Crime prevention | This is a multi-family group-based intervention targeting juveniles convicted for the first time. The goal is to help youth and their families find solutions to family conflict and poor decision-making that will prevent youth’s recidivism and improve personal and family well-being. The program is rated Promising. Intervention group youth showed a statistically significant lower likelihood of recidivating, compared with youth in the probation comparison group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: All Stars™ |
|
Schools, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This is an interactive, school-based, character education and problem behavior prevention program designed to prevent high-risk behaviors in adolescents by having instructors provide them with models of good behavior. It is implemented in whole classroom, small group, and one-on-one sessions. This program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences found between treatment and control groups in substance use, sexual activity, or violence. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Teaching Students to Be Peacemakers |
|
School safety, Youth development, School climate, Juvenile (under 18) | This is a school-based, conflict resolution program designed to teach students how to manage conflicts constructively. The program is rated Promising. Participants showed a statistically significant greater likelihood of using constructive strategies, such as negotiating, and lower likelihood of using detrimental strategies, compared with the control group. There were no statistically significant effects on the use of smoothing or withdrawing as conflict resolution strategies. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Supporting Adolescents with Guidance and Employment (SAGE) |
|
Assault, Gun violence, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Violent offenders, Youth development, Jobs and workforce development, Positive youth development, Recreation, Young juvenile offenders, Employment initiatives | This is a violence prevention program designed to reduce problem behaviors in African American male adolescents. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences between participants in the intervention and control groups in overall problem behaviors, violent behaviors, or risky behaviors. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Model Smoking Prevention Program |
|
Schools, Juvenile health, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This is a smoking prevention program designed to promote awareness and knowledge of the harms of tobacco use among school-aged children. The program is rated Promising. Students in the intervention group had a statistically significant lower likelihood of smoking and smoked fewer average cigarettes per week, compared with students in the control group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Project EX |
|
Schools, Juvenile health, Substance abuse, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This is a school-based tobacco cessation program for high school students, which incorporates motivational activities to discourage smoking. The program is rated Promising. Participants in the treatment groups had a statistically significant lower likelihood of reporting tobacco use in the past 30-days, compared with participants in the control group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Maine Juvenile Drug Treatment Courts |
|
Alcohol-Related Offenses, Drug courts, Juvenile courts, Heroin, Marijuana, Alcohol, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Diversion, Treatment, Problem-solving courts, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Opioids | These court supervised, post-plea (but pre-final disposition) drug diversion programs provide comprehensive community-based treatment services to juveniles convicted of an offense and their families. The program is rated Promising. The program had a statistically significant impact on recidivism. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Residential Student Assistance Program (RSAP) |
|
Marijuana, Alcohol, Mental health, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Foster care/child welfare system, Treatment, Juvenile detention, Child health and welfare, Juvenile justice, Legal substances, Drugs | This is a substance abuse intervention program for high-risk adolescents (ages 12–18) living in residential facilities. The program is rated Promising. Treatment group youth showed a statistically significant lower likelihood of reporting alcohol, marijuana, or overall alcohol and other drug (AOD) use in the previous 30 days, compared with comparison group youth. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Minneapolis Center for Victim-Offender Mediation |
|
Assault, Mediators, Restitution, Violent offenders, Property crime, Victims of crime, Recidivism, Crime prevention | This is a restorative justice program that provides juveniles who have been convicted of an offense and their victims the opportunity to meet face to face in the presence of a mediator to discuss the offense. The program is rated Promising. Individuals in the program were statistically significantly more likely to complete their restitution obligation. There was a statistically significant impact on victim satisfaction with the justice system, but there was no statistically significant impact on Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Taking Charge |
|
Girls, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | A group-based curriculum designed to help pregnant and parenting female students stay in school. The program is rated Promising. At the 6-week follow-up, the program had a statistically significant impact on the treatment group compared to the control group in attendance, grade averages, coping behavior and problem solving skills. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Adolescent Diversion Project (Michigan State University) |
|
Burglary, Larceny/theft, Motor vehicle theft, Juvenile courts, Diversion, Violent offenders, Positive youth development, Juvenile delinquency, Crime prevention, Juvenile (under 18) | This is a strengths-based, university-led program that diverts arrested youth from formal processing in the juvenile justice system and provides them with community-based services. The program is rated Effective. Participants in the program had statistically significant lower rates of official delinquency, compared with control group youth. However, there was no statistically significant difference between groups in self-reported delinquency. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Peers Making Peace |
|
Assault, Dropout/expulsion, School safety, Youth development, School climate, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Violent crime, Crime prevention | This is a peer-mediation program designed to handle conflicts both in and out of school and to help maintain drug-free schools. The program is rated Promising. The treatment group had statistically significantly fewer assaults, expulsions, discipline referrals, absences, a greater improvement in self-efficacy, and statistically significantly improved in academic performance, compared with the control group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Stewards of Children® |
|
Children exposed to violence, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18) | This is a child sexual abuse (CSA) prevention training program to educate adults, such as childcare professionals, to prevent, recognize, and react to CSA. The program is rated Promising. Participants who received the in-person and web-based training demonstrated a statistically significant higher level of CSA knowledge and a greater number of preventative behaviors, compared with the wait-list control group. There was no statistically significant difference found between groups in CSA attitudes. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Independence Youth Court |
|
Diversion, Youth/peer courts, Young juvenile offenders, Crime prevention, Youth courts | This is a diversion program for young persons. The primary goal of the program is to reduce the occurrence of juvenile crime by diverting youth from the traditional juvenile justice system and providing an alternative to formal processing. The program is rated Promising. Treatment group youth were statistically significantly less likely to reoffend, compared with control group youth. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: The Peacemakers Program |
|
School safety, Gun violence, Violent crime, Crime prevention, Juvenile (under 18) | This is a school-based intervention designed to reduce violence and improve interpersonal behavior in youth. The program is rated Promising. Participants showed a statistically significant positive effect knowledge of psychosocial skills and fewer self-reported and teacher-reported behavior problems, disciplinary incidents, conflict mediation referrals, and suspensions, compared with the control group. However, there was no statistically significant effect on attitudes toward guns and violence. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Michigan Model for Health |
|
Schools, Alcohol, Mental health, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Legal substances, Drugs | This is a health education curriculum that targets K–12 students and includes age-appropriate lessons that focus on the most serious health challenges facing school-aged children. The program is rated Promising. There was a statistically significant impact on aggressive behavior, social and emotional health, interpersonal and drug refusal skills, and past-30-day alcohol and cigarette use. However, there was no statistically significant effect on prosocial behavior. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Canberra Reintegrative Shaming Experiments |
|
Larceny/theft, Alcohol, Diversion, Violent offenders, Victims of crime, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Property crime, Intimate partner violence, Procedural justice | This is a restorative justice program that uses conferencing to repair the harm. The program is rated Promising. Participants had a statistically significant lower likelihood of committing violent offenses, and a greater likelihood of reporting a belief in the law, negative attitude toward reoffending, and greater effort to not drive drunk, compared with the control group. There were mixed findings in the rate of drunk driving, and no difference in property crimes, shoplifting, or recidivism. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Common Sense Parenting |
|
Mental health, Juvenile (under 18) | This is a group-based, parent-training class designed for parents of youth who exhibit behavior and emotional problems. The program is rated Promising. Treatment group parents reported statistically significant greater improvements in parental satisfaction, family satisfaction, parental efficacy, and children’s externalizing behaviors, compared with control group parents. However, there were no statistically significant differences in children’s internalizing behaviors. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Success in Stages® Program |
|
Bullying, School safety, Computers, Youth development, School climate, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Victims of crime | This was an antibullying program for all students involved: victims, passive bystanders, and bullies. The program is rated Promising. Elementary, middle, and high school treatment groups experienced statistically significant greater proportions of students reporting no participation in bullying-related roles at the posttests. The elementary student treatment group saw statistically significant reductions in bullying and victimization but no statistically significant change in bystander behavior. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Operation Hardcore (Los Angeles, CA) |
|
Gang Crime, Youth gangs, Assault, Homicide, Prosecution, Witnesses, Case Management, Violent crime, Crime prevention, Juvenile detention | This program consists of a judicial intervention, which seeks to improve the prosecution of gang-related crimes. The program is rated Promising. Treatment group cases were associated with a statistically significant greater number of convictions and incarcerations of gang members, and a lower number of case dismissals and rejections, compared with control group cases. However, there was no statistically significant effect on the rate of pleas. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Across Ages |
|
Schools, Substance abuse, Truancy, Youth development, Positive youth development, Drug abuse prevention and education, Drugs, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Juvenile delinquency | This is an intergenerational mentoring initiative designed to delay or reduce substance use by increasing the resiliency and protective factors of at-risk middle school youth. The program is rated Promising. The treatment group showed statistically significant improvements in school attendance; reactions to situations involving drug use; and attitudes toward school, the future, and elders, compared with the control group; however, there were no effects on overall well-being or substance use. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Adults and Children Together (ACT) Raising Safe Kids Program |
|
Children exposed to violence, Trauma, Bullying, Schools, School safety, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18) | This is an antiviolence program designed to prevent child maltreatment by providing education, resources, and support to parents to improve their parenting skills. The program is rated Promising. Treatment group parents reported a statistically significant reduction in using harsh discipline strategies and increase in appropriate developmental expectations, compared with control group parents at the 3-month follow up. However, there was no statistically significant difference in nurturing. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: STARS (Start Taking Alcohol Risks Seriously) for Families |
|
Alcohol-Related Offenses, Alcohol, Underage drinking, Deinstitutionalization of status offenders, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Substance abuse, Legal substances, Drugs | This is a health promotion program designed to prevent alcohol use among at-risk middle and junior high school youth. The goal is to postpone alcohol use until adulthood. The program seeks to identify the various risk factors that youth are exposed to and offer them targeted information concerning underage alcohol use. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant effects on frequency of alcohol use, quantity of alcohol consumption, or heavy alcohol use. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Success for All (SFA) |
|
Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This is a schoolwide, intensive educational intervention to detect and resolve literacy problems for children in mostly high-poverty schools. The program is rated Effective. Students in treatment group schools demonstrated statistically significant higher levels of word identification and passage comprehension, and higher scores on Word Attack (a test that measures phonological awareness), compared with students in control group schools. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Resolving Conflict Creatively Program (New York City) |
|
Mental health, School safety, Children exposed to violence, Trauma, Treatment, School climate, Juvenile (under 18) | This is a school-based program designed to improve conflict resolution in children. The program is rated Promising. Participants had a statistically significant lower level of aggressive interpersonal negotiation strategies, conduct problems, aggressive behavior, hostile attribution bias, and depressive symptoms, and a higher level of competent negotiation strategies and prosocial behavior, compared with nonparticipants. There was no statistically significant difference in aggressive fantasies. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Family Development Research Program (Syracuse, NY) |
|
Juvenile health, Mental health, Truancy, Children exposed to violence, Case Management, Youth development, Home visiting, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This early childhood program sought to promote child and family functioning, and social, cognitive, and language skills of children, through home visitation, parent training, and child-care beginning from birth to age 5. The program is rated Promising. Intervention children reported statistically significant higher perceptions about themselves and school, compared with control children. There were no statistically significant effects on disliked attributes and liked personal attributes. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: STEP (School Transitional Environment Program) |
|
Dropout/expulsion, Truancy, School climate, Schools, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18) | This is a school-based program designed to improve the ease of students’ transition from elementary to middle or junior high school and address problem behavior. The program is rated Promising. Treatment group students demonstrated a statistically significant lower level of school transition stress, behavior problems, and psychological distress, and higher grade point averages, academic expectations, and improved classroom behaviors, compared with control group students. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Teams-Games-Tournaments (TGT) Alcohol Prevention |
|
Schools, Alcohol, Underage drinking, Recreation, Deinstitutionalization of status offenders, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Substance abuse, Legal substances, Drugs | This is an alcohol prevention program for adolescents (typically high school students) that combines peer support with group reward structures. The program is rated Effective. Treatment group participants demonstrated statistically significant improvements in drinking behaviors, impulsive behaviors, attitudes toward drinking and driving, and alcohol knowledge, compared with control group participants. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: The truth® Campaign |
|
Substance abuse, Legal substances, Juvenile (under 18) | A national smoking prevention campaign that uses advertisements with anti-tobacco messages targeted at youths ages 12 to 17 who are most at risk of smoking. The program is rated Promising. The evaluation found a reduction in smoking prevalence and a decreased risk of smoking initiation among youth. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Caring School Community |
|
Schools, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, School safety, Children exposed to violence, School climate, Larceny/theft, Property crime, Crime prevention, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Juvenile delinquency, Victimization, Victims of crime, Alcohol, Legal substances, Drugs | This is a school-based program designed to improve students’ school attitudes and reduce delinquency. The program is rated Promising. The program showed a statistically significant positive effect on participants’ attainment of higher rates of supportive behavior and spontaneous prosocial behavior, compared with students who did not participate. There were no statistically significant effects on negative behavior, harmoniousness, substance/alcohol use, property damage, theft, or victimization. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: First Step to Success |
|
Mental health, Youth development, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This is an early intervention program designed to identify kindergarten children with antisocial behavior and introduce adaptive behavioral strategies to help prevent further antisocial behavior in school. The program is rated Effective. Treatment group students demonstrated statistically significant positive improvements in adaptive behavior, aggression, problem behaviors, and academic engagement, compared with control group students. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: SMART Team |
|
School safety, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This is a software program designed to teach adolescents to avoid violence. The program is rated No Effects. Students in the treatment group demonstrated a statistically significant higher level of self-awareness and higher intentions to use nonviolent strategies, as well as diminished beliefs in violence, compared with the control group students. However, there was no statistically significant difference in aggressive behavior between groups, which is the main goal of the program. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Alcohol Misuse Prevention Study (AMPS) |
|
Schools, Alcohol, Underage drinking, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Legal substances, Substance abuse, Drugs | This is an alcohol misuse prevention curriculum for 10- to 18-year-olds that emphasized resistance training, knowledge of the immediate effects of alcohol use, identification of the risks of alcohol misuse, and recognition of social pressures that lead to alcohol misuse. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant effects found on alcohol use, alcohol misuse, serious offenses, or refusal skills. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Preventive Treatment Program |
|
Home visiting, School climate, Child health and welfare, Juvenile delinquency, Schools, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Juvenile courts, Courts | This is a prevention program for disruptive kindergarten boys and their parents, designed to reduce short- and long-term antisocial behavior. The program is rated Promising. Treatment group boys had a statistically significant greater likelihood of graduating from high school and having lower rates of property violence, compared with comparison group boys, at the 19-year follow up. However, there were no statistically significant differences between groups in rates of personal violence. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Positive Youth Development Program (Connecticut) |
|
Schools, Alcohol, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, School safety, Positive youth development, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Drugs | This is a school-based program designed to teach students to cope with daily challenges. The program is rated Promising. Students who participated in this program showed a statistically significant improvement in number of coping skills, and in impulse control, peer popularity, and conflict resolution, compared with students who did not participate. However, there were no statistically significant differences in substance or alcohol use or in assertiveness with adults. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Success for Kids |
|
Afterschool, School climate, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This was an afterschool program intended to build children’s resilience and positive connections. The program is rated Promising. Treatment group children demonstrated greater adaptive skills and lower rates of behavioral problems, school problems, attention problems, and externalizing problems, compared with children in the control group. These differences were all statistically significant. However, there was no statistically significant difference in depression. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Connections |
|
Probation, Mental health, Treatment, Case Management, Comprehensive/wraparound services, Corrections, Community corrections, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Juvenile detention | This is a juvenile court-based program designed to address the needs of people on probation who have emotional and behavioral disorders and the needs of their families. The approach is meant to be an integrated, seamless, coordinated system of care for children with mental health problems. The program is rated Promising. The intervention youth were statistically significantly less likely to recidivate, commit a felony offense or serve time in detention, compared with comparison youth. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Positive Family Support (PFS) |
|
Schools, Marijuana, Alcohol, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Case Management, Youth development, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Legal substances, Drugs | This is a family-centered intervention, which addresses family dynamics to prevent substance use and problem behaviors in adolescents. The program is rated Effective. Students in the treatment group were found to report less substance use, including alcohol, tobacco, and marijuana; and demonstrate less antisocial behavior, compared with students in the control group. These differences were all statistically significant. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Consistency Management & Cooperative Discipline® (CMCD®) |
|
School climate, Schools, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This is a classroom and school reform model that emphasizes shared responsibility for learning and classroom organization between teachers and students. The program is rated Promising. The intervention group demonstrated statistically significantly greater improvement in reading and mathematics achievement on the Texas Assessment of Academic Skills reading subtest from pretest to posttest at the end of the second year of intervention. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Child-Parent Center Program (Chicago, Ill.) |
|
Dropout/expulsion, Truancy, Youth development, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18) | This is a school- and family-based early intervention program that provides comprehensive educational and family support services to economically disadvantaged children. The program is rated Promising. The treatment group showed statistically significant declines in substance use, incarceration rates, and felony arrest rates at age 24, compared with the comparison group. However, there was no statistically significant effects on conviction rates or depressive symptoms. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Spit Tobacco Intervention for Athletes |
|
Schools, Substance abuse, Treatment, Afterschool, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This is a program for athletes on the danger of addiction and long-term use of spit tobacco. The program is rated Promising. Two studies showed mixed findings. One found no statistically significant effect on spit tobacco initiation; the second found athletes in the intervention were less likely than control group athletes to begin use. One study found a statistically significant higher cessation rate for the intervention group; the other found no statistically significant effect on cessation. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Methodist Home for Children's Value-Based Therapeutic Environment (VBTE) Model |
|
Juvenile courts, Juvenile health, Mental health, Intake/assessment, Violent offenders, Treatment, Case Management, Young juvenile offenders, Juvenile detention | This is a nonpunitive treatment model that concentrates on teaching juvenile justice–involved youth about prosocial behaviors as alternatives to antisocial behaviors. The program is rated Promising. Overall, findings were mixed. Treatment group youth had a statistically significant lower likelihood of being convicted for any new offense, compared with control group youth. However, there were no statistically significant effects on new charges or on incarceration rates. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: CASASTART |
|
Schools, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Truancy, Case Management, Youth development | This is a neighborhood-based, intensive case-management approach to prevent drug use and delinquency for high-risk adolescents living in distressed neighborhoods. The program is rated No Effects. While treatment group youths had statistically significant reductions in the frequency of total violence and drug sales, there were no statistically significant effects on delinquency, property or status offenses, arrests and tickets, truancy, and disciplinary incidents or suspensions. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: I Can Problem Solve (ICPS) |
|
School safety, Youth development, Schools, Juvenile (under 18), Drugs | This is a universal school-based prevention program that trains children by offering them a variety of solutions to problems. The program is rated Promising. Treatment group students demonstrated statistically significant improvements on measures of problem solving, understanding consequences, and self-regulation, compared with the improvements made by control group students. However, there was no statistically significant effect on social competence. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Tribes |
|
School safety, Treatment, School climate, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This is a prevention program for elementary school students, which is designed to reduce aggressive and violent behavior. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences between the treatment and control groups in aggressive behavior, rule-breaking behavior, social problems, or attention problems. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Steps to Respect® |
|
Bullying, School safety, Youth development, School climate, Child health and welfare, Victimization, Juvenile (under 18), Victims of crime | This is a schoolwide bullying prevention program that seeks to reduce bullying perpetration and victimization by increasing staff awareness and students’ social–emotional skills. The program is rated No Effects. Despite some statistically significant findings, there were no statistically significant differences between students in intervention and control schools in self-reported bullying victimization, observed nonphysical bullying, self-reported bullying perpetration, and gossip victimization. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Wyman’s Teen Outreach Program® (TOP®) |
|
Dropout/expulsion, Truancy, Youth development, Schools, Juvenile (under 18) | This is a school-based youth development program for adolescents ages 12–19 that aims to prevent school failure and suspension through curriculum-guided discussion and community service. The program is rated Promising. Treatment group youth had lower rates of course failure and school suspension, compared with comparison group youth. These were statistically significant differences. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Little Village Gang Violence Reduction Project (Comprehensive Gang Model) |
|
Gang Crime, Youth gangs, Probation, Community policing, Problem-oriented policing, Young juvenile offenders, Property crime, Crime prevention, Drugs, Violent crime | This is a comprehensive gang violence reduction program designed for the Little Village neighborhood of Chicago. The program is rated Promising. Treatment group youth who participated in the program had statistically significant reductions in total violent crime, serious violent crime, and drug crime arrests, compared with control group youth. However, there was no statistically significant difference in property crime arrests or total arrests. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Staying Connected with Your Teen® |
|
Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Youth development, Treatment, Juvenile delinquency, Juvenile (under 18), Crime prevention, Child health and welfare, Drugs, Drug treatment | This program seeks to reduce substance abuse and problem behavior in adolescents. The program is rated Promising. The intervention group had a statistically significant decrease in favorable attitudes toward substance use at the 24-month follow up and in drug use frequency at the 72-month follow up, compared with the comparison group. However, there were no statistically significant differences at the 24-month follow up in violent and delinquent behavior and perceived harm of drug use. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Gang Reduction Program (Los Angeles, California) |
|
Gang Crime, Youth gangs, Assault, Gun violence, Youth/peer courts, Violent offenders, Dropout/expulsion, Truancy, Community policing, Problem-oriented policing, Databases, Children exposed to violence, Property crime, Immigrants, Minorities, Case Management, Youth development, Treatment, Juvenile detention, Crime prevention, Juvenile (under 18), Mentoring, Child health and welfare | This is a comprehensive, multiyear program designed to reduce youth gang crime and violence. The program is rated Promising. The target area demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in calls for shots fired and gang-related incidents compared with the comparison area. However, there were no statistically significant impacts on calls for vandalism, incidents of serious violence, gang-related incidents of serious violence, or student attendance. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Multidimensional Family Therapy (MDFT) |
|
Marijuana, Alcohol, Mental health, Juvenile health, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Youth development, Treatment, Young juvenile offenders, Juvenile (under 18), Crime prevention, Juvenile delinquency, Child health and welfare, Violent crime | This program seeks to reduce substance use and problem behaviors of youths with substance use disorders. The program is rated Promising. Relative to treatment-as-usual youths, intervention youths showed a statistically significant reduction in the number of crimes committed (i.e., property and violent crimes), substance use problems, and delinquent behaviors. But there were no statistically significant differences in diagnoses of cannabis use disorder or externalizing and internalizing behaviors Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Multisystemic Therapy–Family Integrated Transitions (MST-FIT) |
|
Mental health, Substance abuse, Reentry, Youth development, Home visiting, Treatment, Young juvenile offenders, Corrections, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Drugs, Drug treatment | This intervention provides integrated individual and family services to juveniles who have co-occurring mental health and chemical dependency disorders during their transition from incarceration back into the community. The program is rated Promising. Treatment group youth were at statistically significantly lower risk for felony recidivism, compared with control group youth. However, there was no impact on overall recidivism, violent felony recidivism, or misdemeanor recidivism. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Mendota Juvenile Treatment Center |
|
Mental health, Intake/assessment, Violent offenders, Youth development, Treatment, Recidivism, Corrections, Crime prevention, Juvenile detention, Juvenile justice | This is a residential program that provides mental health treatment to violent juveniles. The program is rated Promising. Participants in the treatment group demonstrated a statistically significant lower likelihood of violent (but not general) recidivism and had a longer offense-free period in the community prior to committing felony, violent, or violent felony (but not misdemeanor) offenses, compared with control group participants. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Job Corps |
|
Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Dropout/expulsion, Jobs and workforce development, Employment initiatives, Child health and welfare, Juvenile delinquency prevention, Alcohol, Legal substances, Drugs | This is an educational and job training program for economically disadvantaged youth. The program is rated Promising. Youth in Job Corps demonstrated a lower rate of future arrest, conviction, and incarceration, as well as a higher rate of employment, higher earnings, and longer time spent employed, compared with control group youth. These findings were statistically significant. However, there were no statistically significant differences in alcohol or illegal drug use. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Communities Mobilizing for Change on Alcohol |
|
Alcohol-Related Offenses, Alcohol, Underage drinking, Legal substances, Substance abuse, Drugs, Juvenile (under 18) | This is a community program designed to reduce youth’s access to alcohol by changing community and law enforcement policies, attitudes, and practices. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences between treatment sites and control sites in youth’s drinking prevalence, number of past-month drinking occasions, number of drinks consumed, attempts to purchase alcohol, or in alcohol merchants’ behavior. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Bicultural Competence Skills Approach |
|
Tribal youth, Marijuana, Alcohol, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Legal substances, Drugs, Juvenile (under 18) | This program is designed to prevent substance use in American Indian adolescents by teaching them bicultural social skills. The program is rated Promising. Youth who participated in the program demonstrated lower rates in use of smokeless tobacco, alcohol, marijuana, and inhalants. Program youth also showed better knowledge of substances and alternatives to substance use, self-control, and assertiveness, compared with control group youth. These differences were statistically significant. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Boys and Girls Club - Project Learn |
|
Dropout/expulsion, Truancy, Youth development, Afterschool, Schools, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This is an out-of-school program designed to improve educational performance in adolescents. This program is rated Promising. The program showed a statistically significant positive effect on participants’ attainment of higher grades in math, reading, spelling, history, science, and social studies, and a higher attendance rate, compared with students who did not participate. However, there was no statistically significant difference between groups in English, writing, and geography grades. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Al's Pals: Kids Making Healthy Choices |
|
Mental health, School safety, Children exposed to violence, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This is an early childhood curriculum designed to increase social-emotional competence and coping skills in young children. The program is rated Promising. Children in the intervention group demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in social-emotional competence and positive coping skills and fewer problem behaviors, compared with children in the control group. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Active Parenting of Teens: Families in Action |
|
Schools, Alcohol, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Youth development, Afterschool, Child health and welfare, Legal substances, Drugs | This is a family-based alcohol prevention program for families with middle school-aged children. The program is rated Promising. Students in the program reported fewer family fights; higher family cohesion, and school attachment; and more negative views on underage alcohol consumption, compared with control group students. Parents in the program reported greater opposition to underage alcohol consumption, compared with control group parents. These differences were statistically significant. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Operation New Hope |
|
Parole, Reentry, Violent offenders, Treatment, Community corrections, Corrections, Juvenile detention, Child health and welfare, Drugs, Drug treatment | This is a curriculum-based aftercare program designed to assist chronic, high-risk juveniles in their reintegration to the community after they are released from secure confinement. The program is rated Promising. Participants in the treatment group had a statistically significant lower number of rearrests and revocations and lower likelihood of substance use and associations with negative peers, compared with participants in the control group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Athletes Targeting Healthy Exercise & Nutrition Alternatives (ATHENA) |
|
Girls, Schools, Marijuana, Alcohol, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Juvenile (under 18), Legal substances, Drugs | This is a team-centered, health promotion program for female high school athletes. The program is rated Promising. Athletes who participated in the program had a statistically significant higher likelihood of reporting improved nutritional behaviors and decrease in lifetime alcohol and marijuana use, compared with control group athletes. However, findings regarding the use of diet pills were mixed, and there was no statistically significant impact on the use of athletic-enhancing substances. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Washington State Aggression Replacement Training |
|
Juvenile courts, Juvenile health, Mental health, Violent offenders, Treatment, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Sanctions | This is a group-based intervention for moderate- and high-risk juvenile court youth in Washington State. The goal is to reduce recidivism rates by teaching anger control, moral reasoning, and social skills. The program is rated No Effects. One study found treatment group youth were statistically significantly more likely to recidivate, compared with the comparison group. Another study found no statistically significant differences in recidivism rates between the treatment and comparison groups. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Media Detective |
|
Schools, Alcohol, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Youth development, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Legal substances, Drugs | This is a media literacy and substance use prevention program intended for third- through fifth-grade students. The program is rated Promising. Intervention group students demonstrated less intention to use alcohol and tobacco in the future, better deconstruction skills, higher understanding of persuasive intent, and higher self-efficacy, compared with control group students. These differences were statistically significant. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: AMIkids Community-Based Day Treatment Services |
|
Probation, Diversion, Intake/assessment, Youth development, Treatment, Access to education, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Courts, Juvenile detention | AMIkids is a program encompassing community-based, experiential treatment interventions for at-risk and delinquent youth, which is designed to reduce recidivism and be cost effective. The program is rated Promising. The treatment group showed a statistically significant lower likelihood of being rearrested, adjudicated, convicted, or experiencing a subsequent commitment for any offense within 12 months of release, compared with the comparison group. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Indianapolis (Ind.) Family Group Conferencing Experiment |
|
Burglary, Larceny/theft, Assault, Diversion, Young juvenile offenders, Recidivism, Crime prevention | This is a restorative justice diversion program for young people who have been convicted of an offense for the first time. It was designed to break their cycle of offending before they commit more offenses. The program is rated Promising. Program youth showed a statistically significant reduction in number of rearrests, compared with control youth, at the 2-year follow up. However, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups in time to rearrest. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Media Ready |
|
Schools, Alcohol, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Youth development, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Legal substances, Drugs | This is a media literacy and substance use prevention program for sixth- through eighth-grade students. The program is rated Promising. Intervention group students reported less intention to use tobacco in the future, compared with control group students, at the 2-week follow up (a statistically significant difference). However, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups in intention to use alcohol in the future. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Midwestern Prevention Project (MPP) |
|
Schools, Marijuana, Alcohol, Juvenile health, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Youth development, Drug abuse prevention and education, Drugs, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Legal substances | This is a comprehensive program intended to promote an antidrug message throughout communities and prevent substance use among middle school students. The program is rated Effective. One study found that treatment group students had statistically significant lower past-month and past-week rates of cigarette use, compared with control group students. However, a second study found no statistically significant differences in smoking, alcohol, or marijuana use between groups. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Taking Charge of Your Life |
|
Schools, Marijuana, Alcohol, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Youth development, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Legal substances, Drugs | This is a school-based, universal substance abuse prevention program for middle school students. The program is rated No Effects. Intervention students self-reported greater use of alcohol and cigarettes and more binge drinking, compared with control group students, at the 5-year follow up. These differences were statistically significant. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in marijuana use. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Brief Strategic Family Therapy |
|
Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Treatment, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Legal substances, Drugs | This is a family-based intervention designed to prevent and treat youth behavior problems. The program is rated Promising. Intervention families showed a statistically significant greater likelihood of being engaged and retained in treatment, and intervention youth showed statistically significant greater improvement in conduct disorder and socialized aggression. There were no statistically significant differences in adolescent alcohol use or improved family functioning. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Gang Resistance Education and Training (G.R.E.A.T.) |
|
Youth gangs, School safety, Juvenile delinquency, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Crime prevention, Gang Crime | This is a school-based, gang- and violence-prevention program, which is designed to teach youth to avoid gang membership and to develop positive relationships with law enforcement. The program is rated Promising. Treatment group students had a statistically significant lower likelihood of being in a gang, compared with control group students, at the 1-year follow up. However, there were no statistically significant differences between groups in delinquency or in violent offending. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Too Good for Violence |
|
Schools, Marijuana, Alcohol, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, School safety, Youth development, School climate, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Legal substances, Drugs | This is a school-based violence prevention and character education program designed to improve student behavior and minimize aggression. The program is rated Promising. The program had statistically significant positive effects on risk and protective factors related to student violence for students in grade 3. There were also statistically significant positive effects on factors related to alcohol, tobacco, drug use, and violence for students in grades 9 through 12. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Richmond (CA) Comprehensive Homicide Initiative |
|
Gang Crime, Gun violence, Homicide, Violent offenders, Truancy, Community policing, Patrol, Problem-oriented policing, Jobs and workforce development, Crime prevention, Policing strategies, Intimate partner violence | This is a problem-oriented policing program that offered a collection of enforcement and non-enforcement strategies designed to reduce homicide in Richmond, Calif. The initiative combined traditional law enforcement practices with prevention and intervention efforts that involved partnerships with the community, other city agencies, and local schools. This program is rated Promising. There was a statistically significant reduction of homicides following the implementation of the initiative. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Thinking for a Change |
|
Probation, Mental health, Reentry, Corrections, Community corrections, Recidivism, Crime prevention | This is a cognitive–behavioral curriculum developed by the National Institute of Corrections, which was designed to change the criminogenic thinking of persons convicted of a crime. The program includes cognitive restructuring, social skills development, and development of problem-solving skills. The program is rated Promising. Persons in the treatment group were found to be less likely to recidivate, compared with those in the control group, at the 6-month follow-up. This difference was statist Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Coping Power Program |
|
Schools, Marijuana, Alcohol, School safety, Juvenile delinquency, Crime prevention, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Substance abuse, Legal substances, Drugs | This is a cognitive-based intervention for aggressive children and for their parents to increase the children’s competence, study skills, social skills, and self-control during the transition to middle school. The program is rated Promising. There were mixed results on self-reported delinquency, but treatment group children showed a statistically significant reduction in substance use and improvement in aggressive behavior, compared with control group children. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Project Venture |
|
Tribal youth, Schools, Marijuana, Alcohol, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Youth development, Recreation, Afterschool, Legal substances, Drugs, Juvenile (under 18) | This is an outdoor experiential prevention program for at-risk American Indian youth, which concentrates on American Indian cultural values to promote prosocial development and avoidance of alcohol and other drugs. The program is rated Promising. Treatment group youth reported statistically significant lower growth in overall substance use (cigarettes, marijuana, alcohol, and other illicit substances), compared with control group youth, at the 18-month follow up. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Project ALERT |
|
Schools, Marijuana, Alcohol, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Drugs, Substance abuse | This is a school-based program for seventh and eighth graders, which was designed to prevent substance use initiation and reduce future substance use. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences in alcohol use, marijuana use, or cigarette use between students who participated in the program and control group students. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Police Foot Patrol, Philadelphia 2009 |
|
Assault, Homicide, Robbery, Databases, Community policing, Patrol, Problem-oriented policing, Situational crime prevention, Arrests | This police foot patrol strategy involved rookie officers patrolling an average beat of 1.3 miles during one shift per day in hot spots in Philadelphia, PA. This program is rated Effective. Compared with the control areas, there were statistically significant reductions in reported violent crime in patrolled areas, although the effect faded once officers were removed from their targeted beats. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: SNAP® Under 12 Outreach Project |
|
Foster care/child welfare system, Youth development, Treatment, Juvenile justice reform, Young juvenile offenders, Juvenile delinquency, Juvenile (under 18), Crime prevention, Mentoring, Child health and welfare | This is a multisystemic intervention for boys younger than 12 who display aggression and antisocial behavior problems. This program is rated Effective. Boys who participated in the program showed a statistically significant decrease in delinquency and aggression scores and in behaviors such as rule-breaking, aggression, and conduct problems, compared with control group boys. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Mandatory-Random Student Drug Testing |
|
Schools, Cocaine, Heroin, Marijuana, Alcohol, Substance abuse, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Crime prevention, Opioids | This program is designed to deter students from substance use and to identify and refer those with substance use problems to counseling or treatment services. Students and their parents sign consent forms, agreeing to the students’ random drug testing as a condition of participation in athletics and other school-sponsored extracurricular activities. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant effects on overall substance use or intentions to use substances. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Shifting Boundaries (Classroom Curriculum and Schoolwide Intervention) |
|
Dating violence, School safety, Children exposed to violence, Trauma, Schools, Crime prevention, Juvenile (under 18), Rape and sexual assault, Violent crime, Intimate partner violence, Victims of crime | This dual intervention aims to reduce peer violence and sexual harassment in middle schoolers by emphasizing consequences and increasing surveillance of unsafe areas. The program is rated Promising. The intervention group had statistically significant reductions in sexual victimization and in violence victimization and perpetration compared with those in the control group. There were no statistically significant effects on sexual harassment perpetration, or knowledge, attitudes, or intentions. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Parent-Child Development Center |
|
Home visiting, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This is a primary prevention parent-training program, which was designed to reduce educational failure and improve child behavior in low-income, minority families with children ages 2 months to 3 years. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences between the treatment and comparison groups in grades, internalizing or externalizing behavior problems, classroom behavior, retention in grade, or total behavior problems observed by mothers or teachers. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Second Step®: A Violence Prevention Curriculum for Elementary School (2002 Edition) |
|
Bullying, School safety, Youth development, School climate, Schools, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18) | This was a universal prevention program designed to reduce impulsive and aggressive behavior in children. The program is rated No Effects. Intervention students had a statistically significant lower likelihood of using aggression while negotiating, needing adult intervention in conflict resolution, and showing more socially competent behavior and prosocial goals. However, the differences between the groups were small and there were no statistically significant differences in antisocial behavior. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Families Facing the Future |
|
Cocaine, Heroin, Marijuana, Alcohol, Substance abuse, Case Management, Crime prevention, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Drugs, Illegal substances, Legal substances, Drugs, Opioids | This is an intensive family program combining relapse prevention and parenting skills training. This program is rated No Effects. Treatment group parents demonstrated statistically significantly less heroin use, fewer domestic conflicts, and higher refusal skills than control parents did. There were no statistically significant differences in other drug use by parents, child drug and alcohol use, child delinquency, child-reported negative peers, or child school attachment. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: NICHD Investigative Interview Protocol |
|
Children exposed to violence, Trauma, Investigations, Law enforcement, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This program consists of a structured interview protocol for professionals conducting forensic interviews with children in sexual abuse investigations. The program is rated Promising. Cases that followed the protocol showed a statistically significant greater likelihood of resulting in charges being filed, compared with cases that were handled prior to the protocol being implemented. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: HOMEBUILDERS |
|
Children exposed to violence, Trauma, Treatment, Case Management, Family reunification, Foster care/child welfare system, Crisis response | This is an in-home, family preservation service and reunification program for families with children returning from or at risk for out-of-home placement. The program is rated Effective. The treatment group had a statistically significant greater number of reunifications and reduced rates of out-of-home placement, compared with the control group. However, there were no significant differences between groups in successful reunification (i.e., whether the children returned to foster care). Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Operation Ceasefire (Boston, Mass.) |
|
Gang Crime, Youth gangs, Weapons violations, Gun violence, Homicide, Violent offenders, Warrants, Community policing, Problem-oriented policing, Trauma, Young juvenile offenders, Crime prevention, Assault | This is a problem-solving police strategy, which was designed to reduce gang violence, illegal gun possession, and gun violence in communities in Boston, Mass. The program is rated Effective. There were statistically significant reductions in youth homicide, citywide gun assaults, calls for service, and recovered new guns following implementation of the intervention. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Strengthening Families Program: For Parents and Youth 10-14 |
|
Alcohol, Substance abuse, Youth development, Child health and welfare, Drugs, Marijuana, Legal substances, Drugs | This is a family-based intervention that seeks to reduce substance use and other problem behaviors in youth ages 10–14. The program is rated Promising. Treatment group youth showed a statistically significant greater number of intervention-targeted behaviors and alcohol refusal skills and a lower initiation of alcohol use, compared with the control group. Treatment group parents, compared with the control group parents, showed a statistically significant greater number of parenting competencies. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Care, Assess, Respond, Empower (CARE) |
|
Mental health, Dropout/expulsion, Suicide, Youth development, Child health and welfare, Schools, Alcohol, Substance abuse, Legal substances, Drugs | This is a brief school-based, suicide-prevention program that seeks to reduce suicide risks and co-occurring health-related behaviors (such as depression and drug use). The program is rated No Effects. Intervention youth reported statistically significant lower levels of depression, compared with usual-care comparison group youth, but there were no statistically significant effects on suicide-risk behaviors, drug-involvement behaviors, drug-use control problems, and adverse drug consequences. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Raising Healthy Children |
|
Schools, Marijuana, Alcohol, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Youth development, School climate, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Legal substances, Drugs | This is a school-based intervention designed to promote positive youth development and reduce substance use. This program is rated Promising. Intervention students showed statistically significant improvements in teacher ratings of antisocial behavior and social competency and reported a statistically significant decline in frequency of alcohol and marijuana use, compared with control students. However, there were no differences in prevalence of alcohol, marijuana, or cigarette use. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Healthy Families America |
|
Children exposed to violence, Case Management, Home visiting, Positive youth development, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Crime prevention, Drugs, Child protection, Intimate partner violence | This is a home-visitation program for expectant and new parents, which was designed to prevent child abuse or neglect. The program is rated No Effects. Treatment group mothers showed statistically significant improvements on some outcomes, such as parental stress and discipline strategies, compared with control group mothers. However, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups in neglect, foster care placement, or substantiated child protective services reports. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Project Northland |
|
Alcohol-Related Offenses, Schools, Alcohol, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Legal substances, Drugs | This was a school and community intervention that targeted children at an early age to prevent and reduce underage alcohol use. This program is rated Promising. The treatment group showed statistically significant reductions in alcohol use, binge drinking, and successful alcohol purchases by young-appearing buyers, compared with the comparison group. However, there was no statistically significant difference between groups in attitudes toward substance use. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Responding in Peaceful and Positive Ways (RIPP) |
|
School safety, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18) | This program for middle school students is designed to provide conflict-resolution strategies and skills to reduce aggressive behavior and prevent violence. The program is rated Promising. Overall, findings were mixed. Results indicated a statistically significant reduction in violent disciplinary code violations and favorable attitudes toward violence for participants, compared with the control group. However, there were no differences between groups in drug use, anxiety, or aggression. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Linking the Interests of Families and Teachers (LIFT) |
|
Schools, Alcohol, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, School safety, Youth development, School climate, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Legal substances, Drugs | This is a program designed to prevent the development of aggressive and antisocial behaviors in children in elementary school. The program is rated Effective. Youth who participated in the intervention demonstrated statistically significant reductions in physical aggression; in initiation of alcohol and tobacco; and in use over time of alcohol, tobacco, and illicit drugs; compared with control youth. However, there were no significant differences between groups in initiation of illicit drugs. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Trauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT) |
|
Mental health, Children exposed to violence, Coping, Trauma, Treatment, Foster care/child welfare system, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Intimate partner violence | This is a therapy program for children who were victims of traumatic life events (such as sexual abuse) and their parents. The program is rated Effective. Treatment group children had a statistically significant lower number of PTSD and depressive symptoms and problematic behaviors, compared with children in the control group. Parents in the treatment group also had a statistically significant lower number of depressive symptoms, compared with parents in the control group. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: The Incredible Years–Child Training Program |
|
Mental health, School safety, Treatment, Youth development, School climate, Schools, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This is a program that aims to reduce behavior problems in children and increase their social and problem-solving skills. The program is rated Effective. Treatment group children demonstrated statistically significant improvements in conduct problems, social competence, and problem-solving skills, compared with control group children, at the posttest. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: LifeSkills® Training |
|
Schools, Marijuana, Alcohol, Juvenile health, Mental health, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Youth development, Drug abuse prevention and education, Drugs, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Legal substances | This is a classroom-based, drug abuse–prevention program for upper elementary and junior high school students. This program is rated Effective. Students who participated in the program reported a statistically significant decrease in prevalence of cigarette, alcohol, and polydrug use; and slower growth in initiation of substance use, compared with control students. However, there were no significant differences between groups on self-reported marijuana use. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Multisystemic Therapy (MST) |
|
Mental health, Violent offenders, Foster care/child welfare system, Youth development, Home visiting, Treatment, Young juvenile offenders, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Juvenile delinquency, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Juvenile detention | This is a family and community-based treatment program for adolescents with serious antisocial, delinquent, and other problem behaviors. The program is rated Effective. The treatment group had a statistically significant reduction in rearrests and number of days incarcerated, compared with a control group that received usual services. However, there were no statistically significant differences between groups in substance use outcomes. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Promoting Alternative THinking Strategies (PATHS®) |
|
School safety, Children exposed to violence, Youth development, School climate, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This prevention program promotes emotional and social competencies and reduces aggression and behavior problems in children. The program is rated Effective. Statistically significant findings included lower peer-ratings for aggressive, hyperactive, or disruptive behavior for intervention children, compared with control children. Further, intervention classrooms showed higher quality climate, levels of interest and enthusiasm, and ability to stay focused, compared with control classrooms. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Multisystemic Therapy for Child Abuse and Neglect (MST-CAN) |
|
Mental health, Children exposed to violence, Minorities, Trauma, Treatment, Foster care/child welfare system, Youth development, Home visiting, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Crime prevention, Crisis response | This program addresses family functioning and parental behavior to reduce child abuse, neglect, and external placement. The program is rated Promising. Compared with the control group, treatment parents and children showed statistically significant improvements in functioning, treatment parents showed significant improvements in social support, and treatment children had a lower likelihood of receiving external placement. However, there were no significant differences between groups on abuse. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Multisystemic Therapy-Psychiatric |
|
Juvenile health, Mental health, Suicide, Youth development, Home visiting, Treatment, Child health and welfare | This is a program that addresses externalizing symptoms, suicidal behaviors, and family relations, while allowing youth with serious behavioral and psychiatric problems to avoid an inpatient setting and spend more time in school and at home. The program is rated Promising. Overall, findings were mixed. Youth who participated in treatment showed statistically significant reductions in suicide attempts, but not suicidal ideation, compared with control group youth, at the 1-year follow up. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Motivational Interviewing (MI) for Substance Abuse Issues of Juveniles in a State Facility |
|
Marijuana, Alcohol, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Juvenile detention, Legal substances, Drugs | This is a person-centered counseling method designed to foster motivation for change in youth who abuse alcohol and marijuana. The program is rated No Effects. Participants showed a statistically significant reduction in likelihood to exhibit negative treatment engagement and drive under the influence of alcohol, compared with control youth; however, there were no significant differences in other outcomes such as positive treatment engagement or driving under the influence of marijuana. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Multisystemic Therapy - Substance Abuse |
|
Cocaine, Marijuana, Alcohol, Mental health, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Violent offenders, Youth development, Home visiting, Treatment, Young juvenile offenders, Child health and welfare, Juvenile delinquency, Juvenile detention, Courts, Drug courts, Problem-solving courts, Illegal substances, Drugs, Legal substances, Drugs | This version of multisystemic therapy is for adolescents with substance abuse and dependency issues. This program is rated Effective. Treatment youth showed statistically significant reductions in marijuana use and in aggressive behavior and convictions for aggressive behavior, compared with control group youth. However, no significant differences between groups were found for symptoms of mental health, criminal behavior, or alcohol or cocaine use. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Positive Action |
|
Schools, Bullying, Substance abuse, School safety, Youth development, Positive youth development, Afterschool, School climate, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This program uses a curriculum-based approach to improve youth academics, behavior, and character. The program is rated Effective. Treatment group students reported statistically significantly less substance use, sexual activity, violent behavior, serious violence-related behavior, and bullying behavior, compared with control group students. There were no statistically significant differences in measures of disruptive behaviors. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Family Matters |
|
Alcohol, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Legal substances, Drugs, Juvenile (under 18) | This is a family-based program designed to prevent and reduce tobacco and alcohol use among children between the ages of 12 and 14. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences found between treatment group youth and control group youth in tobacco and alcohol use at the 12-month follow up. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Örebro Prevention Program |
|
Alcohol-Related Offenses, Schools, Alcohol, Underage drinking, Treatment, Deinstitutionalization of status offenders, Juvenile delinquency, Juvenile status offenders, Crime prevention, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This is a prevention program designed to decrease adolescents’ underage drinking and delinquency by increasing parents’ restrictive and prohibitory attitudes toward these behaviors. The program is rated Promising. Adolescents whose parents participated in the program had a statistically significant lower likelihood of having been drunk in the past month, lower alcohol use overall, and lower delinquency levels, compared with adolescents whose parents did not participate in the program. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Good Behavior Game |
|
Mental health, Substance abuse, School safety, Youth development, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Alcohol, Legal substances, Drugs | This is a classroom management strategy designed to reduce aggressive and disruptive classroom behavior and create a classroom environment that is conducive to learning for students, ages 6 to 10. The program is rated Promising. At the 14-year follow up, the treatment group had statistically significant reductions in levels of alcohol-related disorders and antisocial personality disorder compared with participants in the control group. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Kids Club |
|
Mental health, Children exposed to violence, Coping, Trauma, Treatment, Violent crime, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | A multicomponent approach designed to improve behavioral and mental health in children exposed to intimate partner violence by targeting their knowledge and attitudes about family violence, their emotional adjustment, and their social behavior. The program is rated No Effects. There was no statistically significant improvement for the treatment group in measures of children’s internalizing or externalizing problems or their attitudes about family violence, compared with the control group. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Multisystemic Therapy for Youth With Problem Sexual Behaviors (MST-PSB) |
|
Sex offenders, Diversion, Youth development, Home visiting, Treatment, Juvenile delinquency, Rape and sexual assault, Juvenile justice, Juvenile detention | This program is an adaptation of Multisystemic Therapy, specifically designed for adolescents who have committed sexual offenses and demonstrated other problem behaviors. The program is rated Promising. Program participants had lower rates of self-reported person and property offenses as well as lower rates of arrests for sexual crimes and other crimes, compared with control group participants. These findings were statistically significant. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Project Towards No Drug Abuse (Project TND) |
|
Schools, Marijuana, Alcohol, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Treatment, Drug abuse prevention and education, Drugs, Child health and welfare, Cocaine, Illegal substances, Legal substances, Drug treatment | This is a school-based program designed to prevent substance use. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant effects on marijuana use, cocaine use, or on prevalence of getting drunk, and mixed effects on tobacco use, alcohol use, and hard drug use. There was a statistically significant improvement for the treatment group in overall substance use and an index of all hard drug use. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Nurse-Family Partnership |
|
Juvenile health, Mental health, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Children exposed to violence, Treatment, Home visiting, Intimate partner violence, Crime prevention, Violent crime, Child abuse, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This is a home visitation program for low-income, first-time mothers designed to improve family functioning. The program is rated Effective. Treatment families reported statistically significant decreases in child abuse/neglect and domestic violence and improvements in home learning environments, compared with control families. Treatment children reported statistically significant decreases in substance use, compared with control children, but there were no differences in behavior problems. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Parenting with Love and Limits® |
|
Juvenile health, Mental health, Truancy, Treatment, Young juvenile offenders, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Juvenile detention, Juvenile justice, Juvenile (under 18) | This is a program that combines group therapy and family therapy to treat youth, ages 10–18, who have a primary diagnosis of oppositional defiant or conduct disorder. This program is rated Promising. Findings were mixed. Intervention youth showed statistically significant decreases in rates of recidivism and improvements in behavior, compared with control group youth. However, there were no significant differences between groups on measures of readiness to change. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Perry Preschool Project |
|
Children exposed to violence, Trauma, Youth development, Schools, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This program provides high-quality education for disadvantaged preschoolers. The program is rated Effective. Participants showed statistically significant reductions in lifetime convictions, compared with the control group, but no significant effects on their use of rehabilitation services or lifetime earnings. Participants’ children also showed a statistically significant greater likelihood of completing high school without suspension and being employed, compared with control group children. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: JOBSTART |
|
Dropout/expulsion, Truancy, Jobs and workforce development, Drug abuse prevention and education, Drugs, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Employment initiatives | This is a community- and school-based program designed to increase academic skills and job placement in disadvantaged youth. The program is rated No Effects. There was a statistically significant increase in educational attainment and a decrease in drug use for the intervention group, compared with the control group. However, there were no statistically significant differences between groups in employment, employment earnings, or receipt of public assistance. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Child and Family Traumatic Stress Intervention (CFTSI) |
|
Juvenile health, Mental health, Children exposed to violence, Dating violence, Coping, Grief, Trauma, Treatment, Crisis response, Juvenile (under 18), Intimate partner violence | This is a brief early intervention and secondary prevention model, designed to prevent the development of chronic posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), for children aged 7–18 years who have recently experienced a potentially traumatic event. The program is rated Promising. Compared with the comparison group, the intervention group was statistically significantly less likely to have a PTSD diagnosis or receive a partial/full PTSD diagnosis; they also showed a lower severity of PTSD symptoms. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Functional Family Therapy (FFT) |
|
Probation, Mental health, Violent offenders, Treatment, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Juvenile delinquency, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Juvenile detention, Drugs, Substance abuse | This is a family-based prevention and intervention program for dysfunctional youth, ages 11 to 18, who are justice-involved or at risk for delinquency, violence, substance use, or other behavioral problems. The program is rated Effective. Program participants showed a statistically significant reduction in general recidivism and risky behavior, compared with control group participants. However, there were no differences between groups on felony recidivism or caregiver strengths and needs. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Early Risers 'Skills for Success' Program |
|
Mental health, School safety, Youth development, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This is a competency-enhancement program targeting elementary school children who are at high risk for early development of conduct problems. The program is rated Promising. Participation in the program was associated with statistically significant improvements in children’s academic competence and social skills and in adults’ parenting skills, compared with the control group at the 3-year follow up. However, there were no significant differences between groups in aggressive behavior. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Harlem (NY) Children's Zone - Promise Academy Charter Middle School |
|
Juvenile health, Mental health, School safety, Truancy, Youth development, Afterschool, School climate, Schools, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18) | This is a charter middle school that serves predominately low-income, minority students (grades 6–8) in Harlem who are usually 2 or 3 years behind grade level. The program is rated Effective. Students who were admitted to the school showed statistically significant improvements in English Language Arts scores, math scores, and attendance rates, compared with students who were not admitted. However, there were no significant differences between groups on matriculation. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Child–Parent Psychotherapy |
|
Children exposed to violence, Coping, Trauma, Treatment, Case Management, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Intimate partner violence | This is a dyadic, relationship-based treatment for parents and young children designed to help restore normal developmental functioning in the wake of violence and trauma. The program is rated Promising. The treatment group had statistically significant reductions in the number of child traumatic stress disorder symptoms, child co-occurring diagnoses, child problem behaviors, maternal symptoms, and maternal depression, compared with the comparison group, at the posttest and 6-month follow ups. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Multidimensional Treatment Foster Care-Adolescents |
|
Mental health, Substance abuse, Violent offenders, Trauma, Case Management, Family reunification, Foster care/child welfare system, Youth development, Treatment, Young juvenile offenders, Juvenile delinquents, Crime prevention, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Juvenile detention, Juvenile delinquency, Drugs, Drug treatment | This is a behavioral treatment alternative to residential placement for adolescents with antisocial behavior, emotional disturbance, and delinquency. The program is rated Effective. Treatment group boys showed a statistically significant drop in criminal referral rates, criminal activities, and days spent in lock up, compared with comparison group boys. Treatment group girls showed a statistically significant reduction in delinquency, compared with comparison group girls. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: KiVa Antibullying Program |
|
Bullying, School safety, Children exposed to violence, School climate, Victimization, Juvenile (under 18), Victims of crime, Cyberbullying, Child health and welfare | This school-based program delivered to elementary school students to reduce bullying and victimization was designed for national use in the Finnish comprehensive schools. This program is rated Promising. There were statistically significant reductions for self-reported bullying and victimization and peer-reported victimization for KiVa schools compared with control schools; however, there were no significant differences between treatment and comparison schools on peer-reported bullying. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: PeaceBuilders |
|
School safety, School climate, Juvenile (under 18) | This violence prevention program seeks to reduce negative child behavior for school-aged children. The program is rated No Effects. Overall, there were no differences on teacher and student reported aggression in students. The studies also found mixed statistically significant differences among age groups with students in grades 3-5 displaying less aggressive behavior, but also lower prosocial behavior. The evidence suggests the program did not have the intended effect on students. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Adolescent Community Reinforcement Approach (A-CRA) |
|
Marijuana, Alcohol, Juvenile health, Mental health, Substance abuse, Reentry, Juvenile delinquency, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Crime prevention, Juvenile detention, Drugs, Legal substances, Drugs | This is a behavioral intervention for youth, which is designed to reduce drug and alcohol use and promote an abstinent lifestyle. The program is rated Promising. Participants showed a statistically significant reduction in alcohol use, other drug use, and depressive symptoms, and an increase in linkage to continuing care services, adherence to the continuing care model, and social stability. However, there was no statistically significant effect on high-risk behaviors or delinquency. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Narrative Exposure Therapy for Traumatized Children and Adolescents (KidNET) |
|
Mental health, Children exposed to violence, Immigrants, Trauma, Treatment, Crisis response, Juvenile (under 18) | This is an individual-level, psychosocial treatment that seeks to reduce posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms in traumatized refugee youth living in exile. The program is rated Promising. At the 6-month follow up, treatment participants showed statistically significant improvement in symptoms of PTSD and cognitive functioning, compared with control group youth. However, no significant differences were found between the two groups for comorbid disorders. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Strong African American Families (SAAF) |
|
Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Deinstitutionalization of status offenders, Alcohol, Legal substances, Drugs, Juvenile (under 18) | This is a parental training and family therapy program targeted at rural African American families designed to reduce youths’ substance use and sexual activity. The program is rated Effective. SAAF group youth showed statistically significantly less increase of alcohol use and lower levels of alcohol initiation compared with the control group youth. SAAF group parents experienced a statistically significantly greater change in parenting behaviors targeted by the intervention. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Alternatives for Families: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy |
|
Juvenile health, Mental health, Children exposed to violence, Trauma, Treatment, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This is a family therapy program designed to reduce the effects of child abuse. The program is rated Promising. There were statistically significant reductions in family conflict, parent-child violence, physical punishment, and child abuse risk, and improvements in discipline, cohesion, and child acceptance. There were also statistically significant reductions in child internalizing and externalizing symptoms. However, there were no significant differences between groups in re-abuse rates. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Families And Schools Together (FAST) |
|
Mental health, Dropout/expulsion, Positive youth development, Schools, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18) | This is a multifamily group program designed to empower parents to act as their children’s primary agents and to build helpful parent-to-parent groups with the help of schools. The program is rated Effective. The treatment group had statistically significant reductions in problem behaviors (such as aggression), increases in academic performance, and improvements in family adaptability, compared with the comparison group. However, there were mixed findings on other measures such as social skills. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: The Leadership Program's Violence Prevention Project |
|
School safety, Treatment, School climate, Bullying, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18) | This is a school-based prevention program for students between the ages of 12 and 16, which is designed to increase peer support, improve conflict-resolution skills, and decrease acceptance attitudes toward aggression and violence. The program is rated Promising. Treatment group students reported a statistically significant lower likelihood of using negative conflict-resolution skills (e.g., verbal or physical aggression), compared with comparison group students, at the posttest. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Trauma Affect Regulation: Guide for Education and Therapy (TARGET) |
|
Girls, Mental health, Substance abuse, Children exposed to violence, Treatment, Rape and sexual assault, Violent crime, Juvenile (under 18) | This is a trauma-focused psychotherapy program for those suffering from posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The program is rated Effective. Treated adults showed statistically significant lower PTSD symptoms, depression, and anxiety than comparison group adults. Treated youth showed statistically significant higher levels of hope and lower levels of the PTSD criterion of intrusive re-experiencing than comparison group youth, but there were no impacts in other mental health outcomes. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Athletes Training and Learning to Avoid Steroids (ATLAS) |
|
Schools, Alcohol, Prescription drugs, Substance abuse, Drug abuse prevention and education, Drugs, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This is a multicomponent school-based drug and alcohol prevention program for male high school athletes. The program is rated Promising. The intervention was associated with statistically significant reductions in participants’ intent to use steroids, and statistically significant increases in their knowledge of the negative side effects of steroids and in their ability to refuse steroids and other drugs. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Fourth R Curriculum |
|
Dating violence, School safety, Rape and sexual assault, Crime prevention, Juvenile delinquency, Juvenile (under 18), Crime prevention, Victimization, Intimate partner violence, Violent crime, Victims of crime, Drugs | This interactive classroom curriculum is designed to reduce youth dating violence by addressing bullying, unsafe sexual behavior, and substance use. The program is rated No Effects. The program had small, statistically significant effects on decreasing dating violence and sexual harassment/assault victimization. However, there were no significant effects on sexual harassment/assault perpetration, peer violence perpetration or victimization, sexual activity, substance use, or prosocial attitudes. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Parent–Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) |
|
Juvenile health, Children exposed to violence, Trauma, Treatment, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Child abuse | This program teaches parents new interaction and discipline skills to reduce children’s problem behaviors and parental physical child abuse by improving parent-child relationships and parental responses to difficult child behavior. The program is rated Effective. Treatment group parents showed statistically significant improvements in both parent and child behavior and a reduction in re-reports of child physical abuse, compared with control group parents, at the follow up. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Equipping Youth to Help One Another (EQUIP) |
|
Reentry, Youth development, Treatment, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Correctional facilities, Juvenile justice, Juvenile detention, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Juvenile delinquency, Juvenile detention | This is a multicomponent treatment program administered in juvenile correctional facilities for youth with conduct disorders. This program is rated Promising. Program youth showed statistically significant improvements in social skills and had statistically significant fewer instances of self-reported and staff-reported institutional misconduct, compared with control group youth. However, there were no significant differences between groups on measures of moral judgment. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Operation Peacekeeper (Stockton, Calif.) |
|
Gang Crime, Youth gangs, Gun violence, Homicide, Violent offenders, Community policing, Problem-oriented policing, Young juvenile offenders, Crime prevention | This is a focused-deterrence policing initiative designed to reduce gun homicide in Stockton, Calif., by providing gang-involved youth with positive alternatives to violence. The program is rated Promising. The intervention was associated with a statistically significant 42 percent decrease in the monthly number of gun homicides, compared with pre-intervention trends. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Big Brothers Big Sisters (BBBS) Community-Based Mentoring (CBM) Program |
|
Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Trauma, Youth development, Child health and welfare, Juvenile delinquency, Drugs | This program offers one-to-one mentoring in a community setting for at-risk youth between the ages of 6 and 18. This program is rated Effective. It was associated with a statistically significant reduction in initiating drug and alcohol use and antisocial behavior among mentored youth, compared with non-mentored youth. Mentored youth also showed statistically significant improvement in relationships with parents and academic performance (i.e., better grades and fewer absences). Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Safe Dates |
|
Dating violence, Juvenile health, Sex offenders, School safety, Children exposed to violence, Trauma, Treatment, Victimization, Child health and welfare, Intimate partner violence, Juvenile (under 18), Victims of crime | This is a prevention program for middle and high school students, which is designed to stop or prevent dating violence perpetration and victimization. This program is rated Effective. The intervention group showed statistically significant reductions in psychological, physical, and sexual abuse perpetration, and physical abuse victimization, compared with the control group at the 4-year follow up; however, there were no significant differences between groups on sexual abuse victimization. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Drug Abuse Resistance Education (DARE) (1983-2009) |
|
Schools, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This is a school-based drug use prevention program, taught by police officers, which was designed for students in the sixth through 12th grades. The primary goal was to teach peer resistance and refusal skills so that adolescents can say “no” to drugs. The program is rated No Effects. There were no statistically significant differences between treatment and control group participants in drug use, attitudes toward drug use, or self-esteem. Date Posted: |
None | ||
Program Profile: Communities That Care |
|
Substance abuse, Underage drinking, School safety, Youth development, Juvenile delinquency, Crime prevention, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Schools | This is a planning and implementation system that helps community stakeholders come together to address adolescent behavior problems such as violence, delinquency, substance abuse, teen pregnancy, and dropping out of school. This program is rated Promising. There were statistically significant lower levels of risk factors and a lower likelihood of initiation of delinquent behavior for intervention communities, compared control communities, but mixed results in substance use initiation. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Engaging Moms Program for Mothers in Family Drug Court (Miami, Fla.) |
|
Drug courts, Family courts, Family reunification, Problem-solving courts, Child abuse, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Crime prevention, Alcohol, Legal substances | This is a gender-specific, family-based intervention designed to help drug-using mothers who participate in family drug court to maintain their parental rights. The program is rated No Effects. The program had no statistically significant effects on child welfare outcomes, self-reported drug use, physical child abuse potential, overall psychological stress, self-reported alcohol use, family and social functioning, psychiatric problems, and urinalysis results. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial | ||
Program Profile: Cognitive Behavioral Intervention for Trauma in Schools (CBITS) |
|
Juvenile health, Mental health, Substance abuse, Children exposed to violence, Coping, Immigrants, Minorities, Trauma, Treatment, Schools, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18) | This is a cognitive-behavioral therapy group intervention designed to reduce children’s symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression caused by exposure to violence. The program is rated Effective. Intervention group participants showed statistically significant reductions in depressive and PTSD symptoms, compared with control group participants, at the 3-month follow up. However, there were no statistically significant impacts on classroom behavior problems. Date Posted: |
Randomized Controlled Trial |
Title | Evidence Rating | Topics | Summary | ||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Practice Profile: Mentoring Youth With Emotional and Behavioral Problems |
|
Youth development, Positive youth development, Treatment, Child health and welfare, Juvenile delinquency | This practice encompasses programs that provide youths who have emotional and behavioral problems with supportive relationships (generally with older individuals who offer guidance and encouragement) to improve their mental health outcomes. The practice is rated Effective for improving youths’ internalizing symptoms, externalizing symptoms, and interpersonal skills. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Schoolwide Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports |
|
Youth development, School climate, Schools, Restorative justice, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Law enforcement | This practice utilizes a multi-tiered system of supports designed to make schools more effective in establishing a school culture and building a behavioral supports system to improve students’ behavioral, social, emotional, and academic outcomes. It involves three tiers of support, including both prevention and intervention efforts. The practice is rated Promising for reducing students’ problem behaviors. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Formal Mentoring to Prevent Youth Substance Use |
|
Alcohol-Related Offenses, Schools, Alcohol, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Juvenile delinquency, Legal substances | This practice encompasses programs that provide youths with formal supportive relationships and various positive, community-based activities and experiences to reduce their need to use alcohol and/or drugs. The practice is rated Effective for reducing the likelihood of alcohol initiation and reducing the likelihood of drug use initiation. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: School-Based Cyberbullying Prevention Programs |
|
Bullying, School safety, Computers, School climate, Victimization, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Victims of crime | This practice aims to decrease cyberbullying perpetration and victimization and promote cyber-bystander behaviors among students in kindergarten through grade 12. This practice is rated Promising for reducing cyberbullying perpetration and victimization and is rated Promising for reducing bullying perpetration and victimization. This practice is rated No Effects for promoting cyber-bystander behaviors. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Youth-Initiated Mentoring for Youth Development |
|
Juvenile health, Mental health, Youth development, Child health and welfare, Juvenile delinquency | Youth-initiated mentoring involves a hybrid approach in which youths are empowered to identify, develop, and strengthen natural mentoring relationships from their existing social networks, rather than being assigned a new mentor through a more formal mentoring relationship. The practice is rated Promising for improving psychological, health, school/academic, and social outcomes, and rated No Effects for cognitive functioning outcomes. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: School-Based Interventions to Reduce Suspension and Arrest |
|
Truancy, Youth development, Afterschool, School climate, Juvenile delinquency | This practice includes universal and targeted school-based interventions that aim to reduce student arrests and suspensions by helping students develop prosocial behavioral skills or improving school environment by revising school discipline practices. This practice is rated No Effects for reducing student suspensions and rated No Effects for reducing arrest rates of students. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: School-Based Brief Interventions for Substance Use Among Youth |
|
Schools, Marijuana, Alcohol, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Drugs | This practice consists of time-limited, low-dose therapeutic programs delivered in a school or educational setting that teach skills and encourage motivation to change or prevent substance use in youth participants. This practice is rated Effective for reducing alcohol use but was rated No Effects for reducing marijuana use. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Parent-Involved Antibullying Programs for Youth |
|
Bullying, Children exposed to violence, Trauma, Schools, School safety, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Victimization, Mental health | This practice includes programs that offer a parent-involved component to reduce bullying perpetration and victimization. This practice is rated Promising for reducing bullying victimization and perpetration, reducing negative parenting, and improving positive parenting skills but is rated No Effects for reducing youth depression. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Early Developmental Prevention Programs for At-Risk Youths |
|
Home visiting, Alternative schools, Juvenile delinquency, Crime prevention, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18) | This practice consists of early developmental programs that focus on enhancing child, parent–child, or family well-being to prevent social deviance and criminal justice involvement among at-risk children under age 5. The practice is rated Effective for reducing deviance and criminal justice involvement in youths who participated in early developmental prevention programs, compared with youths in the control group who did not participate. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Trauma-Focused Treatment for Juveniles and Young Adults With Trauma Symptoms and Externalizing Behaviors |
|
Juvenile health, Mental health, Trauma, Treatment, Juvenile (under 18), Young adults (18-24), Child health and welfare | This practice consists of trauma-focused interventions to treat trauma symptoms and externalizing behaviors in juveniles and young adults. The practice is rated Effective for reducing trauma symptoms and for externalizing behaviors in juveniles and young adults, compared with juveniles and young adults in the control group who did not receive treatment. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Interactive Programs for Preventing Marijuana Use in Middle School Students |
|
Schools, Marijuana, Substance abuse, Crime prevention, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Drugs | This practice consists of skill-building and interaction-based activities integrated into school-based programs for grades 6–8 that are aimed at preventing marijuana use among adolescents ages 12–14. This practice is rated Effective for preventing marijuana use. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Social Skills Training for Preventing Antisocial Behavior of Youth |
|
Juvenile health, Mental health, Child health and welfare, Juvenile delinquency, Juvenile (under 18) | This practice involves the promotion of social and social-cognitive competencies to prevent future antisocial behavior. The practice is rated Effective for preventing overall antisocial behavior, aggression, delinquency, oppositional and disruptive behaviors, and general antisocial behavior. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Skill-Building Interventions for Delinquent Behaviors of Youth |
|
Probation, Reentry, Treatment, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Juvenile delinquency, Juvenile justice, Juvenile (under 18), Young adults (18-24), Juvenile detention | This practice involves the use of skill-building interventions to prevent antisocial and delinquent behaviors in youth (ages 12 to 21) and to reduce juvenile recidivism. Skill-building interventions tend to be behavioral in approach or focus on instruction aimed at developing specific skills. The practice is rated Promising in reducing juvenile recidivism. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Psychosocial Interventions for Antisocial Behavior of Juveniles |
|
Juvenile health, Mental health, Treatment, Child health and welfare, Drugs, Drug treatment | This practice involves the use of psychosocial interventions to reduce antisocial behavior in juveniles. Psychosocial interventions consist of both preventive and therapeutic interventions but share the common goal of improving psychosocial functioning. The practice is rated Effective for the reduction of antisocial behavior. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Cognitive–Behavioral Interventions for Justice-Involved Juveniles and Young Adults Adjudicated for an Offense in Europe |
|
Parole, Probation, Mental health, Reentry, Treatment, Crime prevention, Juvenile delinquency, Juvenile detention, Juvenile (under 18), Adjudication | This practice involves the use of cognitive–behavioral interventions to reduce the reoffending of juveniles and young adults adjudicated for an offense in Europe. Cognitive–behavioral interventions include various similar therapies, including thinking skills programs, social skills and problem-solving approaches, and reinforcement of behavioral change. This practice is rated Promising for the reduction of reoffending. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Nontargeted Brief Alcohol Interventions for Substance Use for Juveniles |
|
Marijuana, Alcohol, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Drugs, Legal substances | The practice is aimed at reducing substance use (alcohol and other hard drugs) by providing motivations and/or skills to promote behavior change in a relatively brief time, typically between one to five sessions. The target population are juveniles and young adults ages 11 to 30. This practice is rated Effective for reducing illicit substance use, marijuana use, and alcohol use. The practice is rated Promising for reducing the use of other hard substances. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Selective School-Based Violence Prevention Programs |
|
Bullying, School safety, School climate, Schools, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This practice consists of programs designed to prevent or reduce aggressive or violent behavior in K–12 students who are considered at risk of or who have demonstrated such antisocial behaviors. The practice is rated Effective for reducing aggression in students who participated in school-based violence prevention programs, compared with students who did not participate. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Juvenile Intensive Supervision Programs |
|
Probation, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Juvenile delinquency, Juvenile justice, Juvenile detention | This practice consists of intensive supervision of juveniles on probation in the community, compared with those on traditional community supervision. Conditions of intensive supervision programs may vary, but they generally include increased face-to-face contact with probation officers, drug/urinalysis testing, and participation in programming (such as tutoring, counseling, or job training). The practice is rated No Effects for reducing recidivism. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Teen Court |
|
Juvenile courts, Diversion, Youth/peer courts, Teen courts, Problem-solving courts, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Juvenile delinquency | This is a specialized diversion intervention that offers an alternative to traditional court processing for first-time, nonviolent juveniles. The goal is to hold juveniles accountable for their behavior, repair the harm caused to the community by their offenses, and reduce juvenile recidivism. The practice is rated No Effects for reducing juvenile recidivism. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Early Family/Parent Training Programs |
|
Juvenile health, Mental health, Youth development, Home visiting, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18) | This practice includes programs that seek to provide families and parents with training and skills to help promote their children’s physical, mental, and social skills. The practice is rated Effective for reducing child problem behaviors for children whose families participated in early family/parent training programs, compared with control group children whose families did not participate in programming. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Expressive Writing Interventions for Adolescents |
|
Youth development, Schools, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Mental health | This is a brief psychosocial intervention, also called written emotional disclosure. Expressive writing interventions are individually focused and designed to improve emotional expression and processing during adaptation to stressful situations. The goal is to improve psychological and physical health. The practice is rated Effective for improving adolescents’ problem behaviors, internalizing behaviors, and school participation, and rated No Effects for school performance. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Kinship Care for Children Removed from Home for Maltreatment |
|
Juvenile health, Mental health, Children exposed to violence, Family reunification, Foster care/child welfare system, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18) | An alternative to traditional foster care, this practice places children removed from home due to maltreatment with other members of their family or with friends of the family. This practice is rated Promising for reducing behavioral and adaptive problems, increasing child well-being, decreasing the number of placements, and reducing institutional abuse. The practice is rated No Effects for increasing family reunification and attachment. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Martial Arts Participation and Juvenile Externalizing Behaviors |
|
Mental health, Recreation | The term, “martial arts,” can be used to describe any number of styles or disciplines of self-defense practices. Traditional martial arts include judo, karate, and taekwondo; however, boxing is considered a modern martial art. The practice is rated No Effects for reducing juveniles’ externalizing behaviors. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Cyberbullying Prevention and Intervention Programs |
|
Bullying, School safety, School climate, Schools, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Victimization | This practice comprises intervention and prevention programs that are designed to reduce or prevent negative online behaviors among school-aged children ages 9 to 19. Programs include individual-level, multi-level systemic, and universal or whole-school approaches. This practice is rated Effective for reducing cyberbullying perpetration and victimization. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: School-Based Interventions to Reduce Exclusion |
|
Juvenile health, Mental health, Dropout/expulsion, Truancy, Youth development, Jobs and workforce development, Positive youth development, Afterschool, School climate, School safety, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Juvenile delinquency | School exclusion (more commonly known as suspension and expulsion) is broadly defined as a disciplinary measure imposed in reaction to students’ misbehavior. This practice comprises school-based programs that seek to decrease the prevalence of exclusion and thereby reduce the detrimental effects that suspensions or expulsion from schools may have on students’ learning outcomes and future training or employment opportunities. This practice is rated Effective for reducing school exclusion. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Family-based Treatment for Adolescent Delinquency and Problem Behaviors |
|
Mental health, Substance abuse, Case Management, Treatment, Drug abuse prevention and education, Drugs, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Schools, Juvenile (under 18), Young adults (18-24), Drugs, Drug treatment | In general family-based treatment practices consist of a wide range of interventions that are designed to change dysfunctional family patterns that contribute to the onset and maintenance of adolescent delinquency and other problem behaviors. This practice is rated Effective for reducing recidivism, and Promising for reducing antisocial behavior and substance use, and improving psychological functioning and school performance. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) for Anger-Related Problems in Children and Adolescents |
|
Mental health, Treatment, Juvenile detention, Juvenile justice | Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is a problem-focused, therapeutic approach that attempts to help people identify and change dysfunctional beliefs, thoughts, and patterns that contribute to their problem behaviors. This variant of CBT focuses specifically on children and adolescents who have anger-related problems. The practice is rated Effective for reducing aggression and anger expression, and improving self-control, problem-solving, and social competencies. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Preventive Child Maltreatment Programs |
|
Children exposed to violence, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Crime prevention, Crisis response | Preventive child maltreatment programs are designed to prevent physical child abuse or neglect by educating expectant and new parents in parenting skills, coping with stressors, and stimulating child development. This practice is rated Effective for preventing child abuse, neglect, and maltreatment. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) for Antisocial Behavior in Youth in Residential Treatment |
|
Mental health, Treatment, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Juvenile delinquency, Juvenile detention, Juvenile justice | Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is a problem-focused, therapeutic approach that attempts to help people identify and change dysfunctional beliefs, thoughts, and patterns that contribute to their problem behaviors. This variant of CBT focuses specifically on youth in residential settings. This practice is rated No Effects for reducing recidivism, at the 24-month follow-up period. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Wilderness Challenge Programs |
|
Young juvenile offenders, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Juvenile delinquency, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Juvenile detention, Juvenile justice, Schools, Mental health | Wilderness challenge programs are designed to help non-delinquent or delinquent youth who have behavioral issues build self-esteem and interpersonal skills through physical activity and social interaction. The practice is rated Promising for reducing recidivism, improving interpersonal skills, increasing self-esteem, and improving school adjustment. The practice is rated No Effects for encouraging participants’ beliefs in their ability to control the events that affect them. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Gang Membership Prevention Programs |
|
Youth gangs, Gangs, Gang Crime, Crime prevention | This practice includes programs that are designed to deter youth from joining gangs. Programs can be delivered either to a universal population (i.e., all youth regardless of risk level), or to youth identified as being at-risk for gang membership. Programs include preventive awareness strategies and gang membership prevention strategies. The practice is rated Promising for reducing the likelihood that youth will join a gang. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Police-Initiated Diversion for Youth to Prevent Future Delinquent Behavior |
|
Community policing, Young juvenile offenders, Juvenile delinquency, Policing strategies, Juvenile (under 18), Crime prevention | This practice includes pre-court interventions or strategies that police can apply as an alternative to court processing or the imposition of formal charges against low-risk youth. This approach is designed to reduce reoffending by minimizing youth contact with the criminal justice system and divert youth toward services that address their psychosocial development and other needs that contribute to their at-risk behavior. The practice is rated Effective for reducing future delinquent behavior. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Early Self-Control Improvement Programs for Children |
|
Youth development, Juvenile (under 18), Juvenile delinquency, Child health and welfare | This practice consists of programs designed to increase self-control and reduce child behavior problems (e.g., conduct problems, antisocial behavior, and delinquency) with children up to age 10. Program types include social skills development, cognitive coping strategies, training/role playing, and relaxation training. This practice is rated Effective for improving self-control and reducing delinquency. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Sports Participation and Juvenile Delinquency |
|
Recreation, Afterschool, Crime prevention, Schools, Child health and welfare | This practice includes activities that involve physical exertion and skill in which an individual or team competes against another or others. Sports participation may include team and individual sports; contact and noncontact sports; and activities that take place in and out of school. Sports participation has also been posited to have an impact on juvenile delinquency. This practice is rated No Effects. Participating in sports had no statistically significant effect on juvenile delinquency. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: After-School Programs |
|
Truancy, Afterschool, Drug abuse prevention and education, Drugs, Juvenile delinquency, Crime prevention, School safety, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Mental health, Juvenile delinquency, Mentoring, Drugs | After-school programs generally take place during after school hours and are designed decrease the amount of time youth are unsupervised. Examples of such programs may include recreation-based activities, mentoring, and tutoring services. The practice is rated Promising for child self-perceptions, school bonding, school grades, positive social behaviors, problem behaviors, readings scores, and mathematics scores; and No Effects for delinquency, drug use, and school attendance. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Wraparound Process for Children with Serious Emotional and Behavioral Disorders |
|
Mental health, Case Management, Treatment, Recidivism, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Crime prevention, Juvenile delinquency | This practice is a team-based, collaborative process for developing and implementing individualized care plans for youth with serious emotional and behavioral disorders and their families. The practice is rated Promising for improving mental health outcomes, but rated No Effects for measures related to youths’ living situations, school functioning, and recidivism outcomes. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Computerized Brief Interventions for Youth Alcohol Use |
|
Alcohol-Related Offenses, Alcohol, Underage drinking, Computers, Legal substances, Drugs, Substance abuse, Juvenile (under 18) | A computerized brief intervention is any preventive or therapeutic activity delivered through electronic devices with a maximum total time of one hour. The interventions are designed to help youth think differently about their alcohol use and provide them with skills to reduce or eliminate alcohol use. The practice is rated Effective for reducing short-term alcohol use. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Bystander Education Programs for Sexual Assault Prevention on High School and College Campuses |
|
Crime prevention, Rape and sexual assault, Violent crime, Juvenile (under 18), Campus Crime, Schools, Victims of crime | This practice comprises programs designed to decrease the prevalence of sexual assault among adolescents and college students by educating would-be bystanders (i.e., witnesses) about sexual assault, and promoting the willingness to intervene in risky situations. The practice is rated Effective for reducing rape myth acceptance, increasing bystander efficacy, and increasing intent to help. It is rated Promising for increasing bystander helping behavior and decreasing rape supportive attitudes. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Restorative Justice Programs for Juveniles |
|
Restitution, Juvenile courts, Diversion, Youth/peer courts, Victims of crime, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Juvenile delinquency | Restorative justice programs aim to repair the harm to the victim, decrease recidivism, and improve perceptions of fairness and satisfaction with the process. The practice is rated Promising for reducing juveniles’ recidivism rates, increasing victims’ perceptions of fairness, and increasing juveniles’ completion of restitution and reparation. It is rated No Effects for juveniles’ recognition of wrongdoing or remorse, and satisfaction of the victim or young person committing the offense. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Juvenile Transfer to Adult Court |
|
Juvenile courts, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Problem-solving courts, Juvenile delinquency, Juvenile justice, Prosecution | All states have mechanisms in place (including judicial waivers, statutory exclusions, and prosecutorial direct-files) that allow for juveniles (who commit certain serious or violent offenses) to be transferred for prosecution in the adult criminal court system. The practice is rated No Effects for multiple crime/delinquency types. Youths transferred to adult court had slightly higher odds of recidivating, compared with nontransferred youth; however, this result was nonsignificant. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Programs to Reduce Dating and Sexual Violence for Youth and Young Adults |
|
Dating violence, School safety, Campus Crime, School climate, Juvenile delinquency, Crime prevention, Juvenile (under 18), Victimization, Intimate partner violence, Rape and sexual assault | This practice involves a range of prevention and intervention programs that are designed to address problems associated with dating violence for youth and young adults. The practice is rated Effective for reducing the perpetration of dating violence and improving dating violence knowledge and attitudes. The practice is rated No Effects for reducing dating and sexual violence victimization, reducing sexual violence perpetration, and for improving bystander behaviors. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Juvenile Curfew Laws |
|
Young juvenile offenders, Crime prevention, Child health and welfare | Juvenile curfew laws are designed to restrict juveniles (below ages 17 or 18) from public places during specific hours such as nighttime (e.g., between 11 p.m. and 6 a.m.) or during the school day (e.g., 8:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m.). The primary purpose is to reduce juvenile crime and victimization by keeping them at home with their families or in school. This practice is rated No Effects for reducing juvenile crime during curfew hours. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Juvenile Reentry Programs |
|
Parole, Probation, Reentry, Comprehensive/wraparound services, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Juvenile delinquency, Juvenile detention | This practice consists of reintegrative programs and services designed to prepare juveniles, who were placed out of their homes, for reentry into the community. The overall goal is to reduce the recidivism rate of juveniles released from out-of-home placements. The practice is rated Promising. There was a statistically significant decrease in the recidivism rates of juveniles who participated in the reentry programs, compared with juveniles in the comparison groups. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Incarceration-based Therapeutic Communities for Juveniles |
|
Substance abuse, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Corrections, Juvenile justice, Juvenile delinquency, Juvenile detention, Drugs | This practice employs a comprehensive, residential drug-treatment program model for substance-abusing and addicted juveniles to foster changes in attitudes, perceptions, and behaviors related to substance use. The practice is rated No Effects for reducing recidivism after release for participants in therapeutic communities. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Universal Teacher Classroom Management Practices |
|
School safety, School climate, Juvenile (under 18) | This practice includes classroom management techniques and programs for teaching prosocial behaviors and reducing or preventing inappropriate or aggressive behaviors of students in K–12th grades. This practice is rated Effective in reducing disruptive, inappropriate, and aggressive behavior in students. Test Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: School-Based Conflict Resolution Education |
|
School safety, Youth development, Positive youth development, Juvenile (under 18) | This practice aims to reduce school-based conflict and encourage long-term prosocial behavior. It teaches students to understand the nature of the conflict and provides options for responding. This practice is rated Promising for multiple problem or at-risk behaviors. Student participants in the programs reported significantly fewer antisocial behaviors than students in the control group. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Treatment in Secure Corrections for Serious Juveniles Who Have Committed Serious or Multiple Offenses |
|
Assault, Homicide, Kidnapping, Robbery, Mental health, Intake/assessment, Violent offenders, Treatment, Case Management, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Juvenile justice, Juvenile delinquency, Juvenile detention, Courts, Drugs, Drug treatment | This practice includes interventions targeting serious (violent and chronic) juveniles sentenced to serve time in secure corrections. The overall goal is to decrease recidivism rates when juveniles are released and return to the community. The practice is rated Effective for reducing general recidivism and serious recidivism of violent and chronically offending juveniles. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Universal School-Based Prevention and Intervention Programs for Aggressive and Disruptive Behavior |
|
School safety, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | Universal school-based prevention and intervention programs for aggressive and disruptive behavior target elementary, middle, and high school students in a universal setting, rather than focusing on only a selective group of students, with the intention of preventing or reducing violent, aggressive, or disruptive behaviors. The practice is rated Effective in reducing violent, aggressive, and/or disruptive behaviors in students. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Therapeutic Approaches for Sexually Abused Children and Adolescents |
|
Children exposed to violence, Trauma, Treatment, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Victims of crime | Interventions designed to reduce the negative effects of child sexual abuse, which can include PTSD, internalizing behaviors, and externalizing behaviors. The practice is rated Effective for reducing PTSD symptoms, internalizing behaviors, and externalizing behaviors. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Targeted School-Based Social Information-Processing Interventions for Aggression |
|
School safety, Positive youth development, Alternative schools, School safety, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | This practice examines targeted prevention efforts for particular students that attempt to improve one or more aspects of the students’ social information processing, aiming to prevent and/or reduce aggressive or violent behavior in school-aged children. The practice is rated Effective for reducing aggressive behavior in school-aged children. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Dropout Prevention Programs |
|
Dropout/expulsion, School safety, Truancy, Afterschool, Alternative schools, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Mentoring | School- or community-based programs targeting frequently absent students or students at risk of dropping out of school. These programs are aimed at increasing school engagement, school attachment, and the academic performance of students, with the main objective of increasing graduation rates. The practice is rated Effective for reducing rates of school dropouts, and rated Promising for improving test scores/grades, graduation rates, and attendance. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Universal School-Based Social Information Processing Interventions for Aggression |
|
Dropout/expulsion, School safety, School climate, Schools, School safety, Juvenile (under 18) | School-based violence prevention interventions that target social information-processing difficulties in students, aiming to reduce the aggressive and disruptive behavior of school-aged children. The practice is rated Promising for reducing aggressive behavior in school-aged children. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: School-Based Social and Emotional Learning (SEL) Programs |
|
Mental health, School safety, Youth development, School climate, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare | Designed to foster the development of five interrelated sets of cognitive, affective, and behavioral competencies, in order to provide a foundation for better adjustment and academic performance in students, which can result in more positive social behaviors, fewer conduct problems, and less emotional distress. The practice was rated Effective in reducing students’ conduct problems and emotional stress. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Juvenile Diversion Programs |
|
Drug courts, Juvenile courts, Diversion, Treatment, Victims of crime, Recidivism, Juvenile delinquency, Crime prevention, Problem-solving courts | An intervention strategy that redirects youths away from formal processing in the juvenile justice system, while still holding them accountable for their actions. The practice is rated Promising for reducing recidivism rates of juveniles who participated in diversion programming compared with juveniles who were formally processed in the justice system. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Therapeutic Treatment for Juveniles Having Committed Sex Offenses |
|
Sex offenders, Sex offender management, Violent offenders, Treatment, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Rape and sexual assault, Juvenile delinquency, Violent crime | This practice includes a variety of treatment modalities (including cognitive-behavioral therapy, relapse prevention, and multisystemic therapy), which are designed to reduce the risks and harms associated with juveniles at risk of committing sexual offenses. The practice is rated Promising for reducing juveniles’ rates of general recidivism but rated No Effects for reducing sexual recidivism and violent recidivism. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Interventions Targeting Street-Connected Youth |
|
Juvenile health, Mental health, Missing children, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Family reunification, Foster care/child welfare system, Jobs and workforce development, Juvenile delinquency, Crime prevention, Juvenile (under 18), Alcohol, Legal substances, Drugs | Interventions that aim to improve the situation of street-connected children and young people. The practice is rated Effective for family functioning, but No Effects for alcohol use, depression levels, delinquent behaviors, and internalizing behaviors. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Motivational Interviewing for Substance Abuse |
|
Alcohol-Related Offenses, Cocaine, Marijuana, Alcohol, Juvenile (under 18) | A client-centered, semidirective psychological treatment approach that concentrates on improving and strengthening individuals’ motivations to change. The practice is rated Effective. Individuals in the treatment groups significantly reduced their use of substances compared to those in the no-treatment control groups. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: School-Based Child Sexual Abuse Prevention Programs |
|
Rape and sexual assault, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Crime prevention | This practice comprises school-based programs that are designed to reduce the occurrence of sexual abuse in children and adolescents. The practice is rated Promising for increasing children’s prevention-related knowledge and Effective for increasing protective behaviors and disclosures of previous or current sexual abuse. The practice is rated No Effects for decreasing child self-reported anxiety or fear. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Mass Media Campaigns to Prevent Illicit Drug Use of Youth |
|
Substance abuse, Juvenile (under 18) | These antidrug mass media campaigns concentrate on preventing, reducing, or stopping the illicit drug use of young people (which generally includes individuals 26 and younger), because initiation of substance use typically begins during adolescence or young adulthood. The practice is rated No Effects on illicit drug use and intentions to use drugs. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Bullying Prevention Programs |
|
Bullying, School safety, School climate, Schools, Child health and welfare, Juvenile (under 18), Victimization, Mental health, Victims of crime | The practice includes programs designed to reduce bullying perpetration and victimization and to increase positive bystander behavior in bullying situations. The practice is rated Effective for reducing bullying perpetration (e.g., overall and physical), reducing bullying victimization (e.g., overall and relational), and increasing positive bystander behavior. The practice is rated No Effects for increasing bystander empathy for bullying victims and reducing verbal bullying victimization. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Focused Deterrence Strategies |
|
Gang Crime, Youth gangs, Assault, Gun violence, Homicide, Violent offenders, Community policing, Problem-oriented policing, Sentencing, Courts, Juvenile (under 18) | This practice (also referred to as “pulling-levers policing”) includes problem-oriented policing strategies that follow the core principles of deterrence theory. The strategies target specific criminal behavior committed by a small number of individuals who chronically commit offenses, such as youth gang members or those who repeatedly commit violent offenses, who are vulnerable to sanctions and punishment. The practice is rated Promising for reducing crime. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Juvenile Boot Camps |
|
Diversion, Access to education, Crime prevention, Recidivism, Juvenile delinquency, Juvenile detention, Juvenile (under 18) | Juvenile boots camps, also called shock or intensive incarceration programs, are short-term residential programs that resemble military basic training facilities and target adjudicated juveniles. The practice is rated No Effects. The likelihood of boot camp participants recidivating was roughly equal to the likelihood of comparison participants recidivating. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Juvenile Awareness Programs (Scared Straight) |
|
Crime prevention, Juvenile delinquency, Juvenile detention, Juvenile justice | Deterrence-oriented programs that involve organized visits to adult prison facilities for justice-involved and at-risk youth at-risk. The practice is rated No Effects. The evaluation found that participation in these types of programs increases the odds that youth will commit offenses in the future. Consequently, recidivism rates were, on average, higher for participants compared to juveniles who went through regular case processing. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Formal System Processing for Juveniles |
|
Juvenile courts, Diversion, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Juvenile delinquency, Sanctions | The practice of using traditional juvenile justice system processing in lieu of alternative sanctions to deal with juvenile criminal cases. The practice is rated No Effects for reducing recidivism compared to the youth that were diverted from the system. Test Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Mentoring for Youth Development |
|
Schools, Juvenile health, Mental health, Substance abuse, Underage drinking, Truancy, Youth development, Positive youth development, Afterschool, Juvenile delinquency, Crime prevention, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Drugs | This practice provides youth with a positive and consistent adult or older youth relationship to promote healthy youth development and social functioning and to reduce risk factors. The practice is rated Effective in reducing delinquency and improving educational outcomes; Promising in improving psychological outcomes and cognitive functioning; and No Effects in reducing substance use. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Targeted Truancy Interventions |
|
Truancy, Juvenile (under 18), Child health and welfare, Mentoring | These interventions are designed to increase attendance for elementary and secondary school students with chronic attendance problems. The practice is rated Effective for improving attendance. Date Posted: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Practice Profile: Juvenile Drug Courts |
|
Drug courts, Juvenile courts, Substance abuse, Diversion, Treatment, Problem-solving courts, Recidivism, Crime prevention, Juvenile justice, Juvenile delinquency, Alcohol, Legal substances | Juvenile drug courts are dockets within juvenile courts for cases involving substance abusing youth in need of specialized treatment services. The focus is on providing treatment to eligible, drug-involved juveniles with the goal of reducing recidivism and substance abuse. The practice is rated Promising in reducing recidivism rates, and No Effects for reducing drug-related offenses or drug use. Date Posted: |